These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9222104)
1. Quality control of CGH: impact of metaphase chromosomes and the dynamic range of hybridization. Karhu R; Kähkönen M; Kuukasjärvi T; Pennanen S; Tirkkonen M; Kallioniemi O Cytometry; 1997 Jul; 28(3):198-205. PubMed ID: 9222104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detection of complete and partial chromosome gains and losses by comparative genomic in situ hybridization. du Manoir S; Speicher MR; Joos S; Schröck E; Popp S; Döhner H; Kovacs G; Robert-Nicoud M; Lichter P; Cremer T Hum Genet; 1993 Feb; 90(6):590-610. PubMed ID: 8444465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The application of microwave denaturation in comparative genomic hybridization. de Meulemeester M; Vink A; Jakobs M; Hermsen M; Steenman M; Slater R; Dietrich A; Mannens M Genet Anal; 1996 Nov; 13(5):129-33. PubMed ID: 9021402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The cytogenetic view of standard comparative genomic hybridization (CGH): deletions of 20q in human leukemia as a measure of the sensitivity of the technique. Brecevic L; Verdorfer I; Saul W; Trautmann U; Gebhart E Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1A):89-92. PubMed ID: 11299794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Kallioniemi OP; Kallioniemi A; Piper J; Isola J; Waldman FM; Gray JW; Pinkel D Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1994 Aug; 10(4):231-43. PubMed ID: 7522536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chromosome arm 20q gains and other genomic alterations in colorectal cancer metastatic to liver, as analyzed by comparative genomic hybridization and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Korn WM; Yasutake T; Kuo WL; Warren RS; Collins C; Tomita M; Gray J; Waldman FM Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Jun; 25(2):82-90. PubMed ID: 10337990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization. du Manoir S; Schröck E; Bentz M; Speicher MR; Joos S; Ried T; Lichter P; Cremer T Cytometry; 1995 Jan; 19(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 7705182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Pinkel D; Segraves R; Sudar D; Clark S; Poole I; Kowbel D; Collins C; Kuo WL; Chen C; Zhai Y; Dairkee SH; Ljung BM; Gray JW; Albertson DG Nat Genet; 1998 Oct; 20(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 9771718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative genomic hybridization study of primary neuroblastoma tumors. United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group. Lastowska M; Nacheva E; McGuckin A; Curtis A; Grace C; Pearson A; Bown N Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1997 Mar; 18(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 9071568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of changes in DNA copy number in multiple myeloma. Rao PH Methods Mol Med; 2005; 113():71-83. PubMed ID: 15968096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of degenerate oligonucleotide-primed polymerase chain reaction amplification and labeling methods on the sensitivity and specificity of metaphase- and array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Tsubosa Y; Sugihara H; Mukaisho K; Kamitani S; Peng DF; Ling ZQ; Tani T; Hattori T Cancer Genet Cytogenet; 2005 Apr; 158(2):156-66. PubMed ID: 15796963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification and characterization of a de novo partial trisomy 10p by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Benzacken B; Lapierre JM; Siffroi JP; Chalvon A; Tachdjian G Clin Genet; 1998 Oct; 54(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 9831346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid generation of chromosome-specific alphoid DNA probes using the polymerase chain reaction. Dunham I; Lengauer C; Cremer T; Featherstone T Hum Genet; 1992 Feb; 88(4):457-62. PubMed ID: 1740323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Four-color CGH: a new method for quality control of comparative genomic hybridization. Karhu R; Rummukainen J; Lörch T; Isola J Genes Chromosomes Cancer; 1999 Feb; 24(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 9885977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural unbalanced chromosome rearrangements resolved by comparative genomic hybridization. Daniely M; Barkai G; Goldman B; Aviram-Goldring A Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1999; 86(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 10516433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple method for enhancing hybridization efficiency in chromosome and array comparative genomic hybridization. Kawauchi S; Furuya T; Nakao M; Ikemoto K; Oga A; Sasaki K Biotech Histochem; 2011 Jun; 86(3):192-8. PubMed ID: 20233021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of genomic aberrations using comparative genomic hybridization of metaphase chromosomes. Carless M Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 523():177-202. PubMed ID: 19381938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Whole-comparative genomic hybridization (W-CGH): 1. The quick overview of repetitive DNA sequences on a genome. Pita M; Fernandez JL; Gosálvez J Chromosome Res; 2003; 11(7):673-9. PubMed ID: 14606629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. DNA in situ hybridization (interphase cytogenetics) versus comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in human cancer: detection of numerical and structural chromosome aberrations. Van Dekken H; Krijtenburg PJ; Alers JC Acta Histochem; 2000 Feb; 102(1):85-94. PubMed ID: 10726167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetic changes in primary colorectal cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Nakao K; Shibusawa M; Tsunoda A; Yoshizawa H; Murakami M; Kusano M; Uesugi N; Sasaki K Surg Today; 1998; 28(5):567-9. PubMed ID: 9607913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]