These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9223958)
21. A comparison of two amorphous hydrogels in the debridement of pressure sores. Bale S; Banks V; Haglestein S; Harding KG J Wound Care; 1998 Feb; 7(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 9543975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Investigating the use of Aquaform Hydrogel in wound management. Trudgian J Br J Nurs; 2000 Jul 27-Aug 9; 9(14):943-8. PubMed ID: 11261031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exploring debridement options for chronic venous leg ulcers. Davies CE; Turton G; Woolfrey G; Elley R; Taylor M Br J Nurs; 2005 Apr 14-27; 14(7):393-7. PubMed ID: 15924016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Treatment of ulcus cruris. What is the role of wound dressings?]. Sedlarik KM Med Monatsschr Pharm; 1995 Dec; 18(12):358-62. PubMed ID: 8569588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Treatment of deep partial thickness and indeterminate depth facial burn wounds with water-jet debridement and a biosynthetic dressing. Tenenhaus M; Bhavsar D; Rennekampff HO Injury; 2007 Dec; 38 Suppl 5():S39-45. PubMed ID: 18061187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Criteria for ideal wound dressings. Johnson A Prof Nurse; 1988 Mar; 3(6):191-3. PubMed ID: 3357899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of collagenase to hydrogel dressings in maintenance debridement and wound closure. Milne CT; Ciccarelli A; Lassy M Wounds; 2012 Nov; 24(11):317-22. PubMed ID: 25876167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using a hydrogel, foam, and dressing retention sheet. Krasner D Ostomy Wound Manage; 1992 Apr; 38(3):28-30, 32, 34. PubMed ID: 1580970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. In vitro investigations of a new hydrogel dressing. Thomas S; Hay NP J Wound Care; 1996 Mar; 5(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 8826272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Calcific myonecrosis of the leg treated by debridement and limited access dressing. Sreenivas T; Nandish Kumar KC; Menon J; Nataraj AR Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2013 Mar; 12(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 23446369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical experience with wound biofilm and management: a case series. Hurlow J; Bowler PG Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Apr; 55(4):38-49. PubMed ID: 19387095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Granugel: hydrocolloid gel. Williams C Br J Nurs; 1996 Feb 8-21; 5(3):188, 190. PubMed ID: 8696131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Debridement methods in wound care. Anderson I Nurs Stand; 2006 Feb 22-28; 20(24):65-6, 68, 70 passim. PubMed ID: 16526165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds. Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pressure ulcer debridement and cleansing: a review of current literature. Rodeheaver GT Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Jan; 45(1A Suppl):80S-85S; quiz 86S-87S. PubMed ID: 10085978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Back to basics: choosing the correct wound dressing. Walker D Am J Nurs; 1996 Sep; 96(9):35-9. PubMed ID: 8855910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. A comparison of wound environments. Gates JL; Holloway GA Ostomy Wound Manage; 1992 Oct; 38(8):34-7. PubMed ID: 1482522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. VACUTEX: a dressing designed for patients, tailored by nurses. Deeth M; Pain L Br J Nurs; 2001 Feb 22-Mar 7; 10(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 12170652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Assessing clinical efficacy of a hydrocolloid/alginate dressing on full-thickness pressure ulcers. Barr JE; Day AL; Weaver VA; Taler GM Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):28-30, 32, 34-6 passim. PubMed ID: 7546113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]