These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9224034)

  • 1. An upside-down world?
    Hewson B
    Mod Midwife; 1997 May; 7(5):18-9. PubMed ID: 9224034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whose body is it, anyway?
    Hewson B
    Nurs Stand; 1997 May; 11(35):18. PubMed ID: 9239007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Whose rights supersede, those of the patient or those of the unborn fetus?
    Cady RF
    JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul; 1999 Mar; 1(1):7-9. PubMed ID: 10823985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The right to say no.
    Ferguson P
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):28-30. PubMed ID: 9687749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The right to choose.
    Savage W
    Nurs Stand; 1998 May 20-26; 12(35):14. PubMed ID: 9687689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An Orwellian scenario: court ordered caesarean section and women's autonomy.
    Cahill H
    Nurs Ethics; 1999 Nov; 6(6):494-505. PubMed ID: 10696195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Burton v. Florida: Maternal-fetal conflicts and medical decision-making during pregnancy.
    Wevers K
    J Law Med Ethics; 2010; 38(2):436-40. PubMed ID: 20579240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Court-authorised caesarean section.
    Edozien L
    BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1096. PubMed ID: 25047485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Human rights, reproductive freedom, medicine and the law.
    McLean SA; Ramsey J
    Med Law Int; 2002; 5(4):239-58. PubMed ID: 14983883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Compulsory caesarean: the ruling of the Court of Appeal.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1997 Aug; 7(8):20-2. PubMed ID: 9348861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Court-ordered care--a complication of pregnancy to avoid.
    Cantor JD
    N Engl J Med; 2012 Jun; 366(24):2237-40. PubMed ID: 22693994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enforced caesareans.
    Bull Med Ethics; 1997 Apr; (127):21-4. PubMed ID: 16127837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mother's rights prevail: In re A.C. and the status of forced obstetrical intervention in the District of Columbia.
    Neale H
    J Health Hosp Law; 1990 Jul; 23(7):208-13. PubMed ID: 10105493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal aspects of consent 11: compulsory Caesarean sections.
    Dimond B
    Br J Nurs; 2001 Aug 9-Sep 12; 10(15):1002-4. PubMed ID: 11923735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. HIV in pregnancy: interests of the mother and the baby.
    Isaacs D; Garsia R; Peat B
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2003; 39(1):60-3; discussion 63-6. PubMed ID: 12542816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Legal issues. Refusal overruled.
    Dimond B
    Mod Midwife; 1996 Dec; 6(12):20-2. PubMed ID: 9052162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delivering justice.
    Andrews A
    Nurs Times; 1998 Jun 10-16; 94(23):31-2. PubMed ID: 9687750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Court-ordered caesareans.
    Prochaska E; Lomri S
    Pract Midwife; 2014 Nov; 17(10):12-4. PubMed ID: 25582002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court-ordered cesarean sections receive judicial defeat.
    Curran WJ
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Aug; 323(7):489-92. PubMed ID: 2082954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.