These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9224384)

  • 1. Results of laser tissue soldering in vasovasostomy and epididymovasostomy: experience in the rat animal model.
    Seaman EK; Kim ED; Kirsch AJ; Pan YC; Lewitton S; Lipshultz LI
    J Urol; 1997 Aug; 158(2):642-5. PubMed ID: 9224384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward a sutureless vasovasostomy: use of biomaterials and surgical sealants in a rodent vasovasostomy model.
    Schiff J; Li PS; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):1192-5. PubMed ID: 15311068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model.
    Schiff J; Li PS; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2004 Apr; 171(4):1720-5. PubMed ID: 15017273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fibrin glue vasal anastomosis compared to conventional sutured vasovasostomy in the rat.
    Silverstein JI; Mellinger BC
    J Urol; 1991 Jun; 145(6):1288-91. PubMed ID: 2033718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fibrin glue and conventional sutured vasal anastomosis in the rat.
    Küçükaydin M; Okur H; Kontaş O; Patiroğlu TE
    J Surg Res; 1995 Nov; 59(5):601-5. PubMed ID: 7475007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Microsurgical side-to-end epididymovasostomy: surgical technique and outcomes].
    Matsuda T; Horii Y; Nonomura M; Nishimura K; Yoshida O
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1991 Jun; 37(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 1892009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of intussusception pull-through end-to-side and conventional end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy: prospective randomized controlled study in male wistar rats.
    McCallum S; Li PS; Sheynkin Y; Su LM; Chan P; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2002 May; 167(5):2284-8. PubMed ID: 11956494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome and late failures compared in 4 techniques of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in 153 consecutive men.
    Schiff J; Chan P; Li PS; Finkelberg S; Goldstein M
    J Urol; 2005 Aug; 174(2):651-5; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16006931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fibrin-glue assisted vasoepididymostomy: a comparison to standard end-to-side microsurgical vasoepididymostomy in the rat model.
    Shekarriz BM; Thomas AJ; Sabanegh E; Kononov A; Levin HS
    J Urol; 1997 Oct; 158(4):1602-5. PubMed ID: 9302182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microsurgical vasovasostomy after failed vasovasostomy.
    Paick JS; Park JY; Park DW; Park K; Son H; Kim SW
    J Urol; 2003 Mar; 169(3):1052-5. PubMed ID: 12576844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Innovative single-armed suture technique for microsurgical vasoepididymostomy.
    Monoski MA; Schiff J; Li PS; Chan PT; Goldstein M
    Urology; 2007 Apr; 69(4):800-4. PubMed ID: 17445685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of vasovasostomy techniques in rats utilizing conventional microsurgical suture, carbon dioxide laser, and fibrin tissue adhesives.
    Ball RA; Steinberg J; Wilson LA; Loughlin KR
    Urology; 1993 May; 41(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 8488619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vasovasostomy: a step-by-step surgical technique video.
    Hakky TS; Coward RM; Smith RP; Kovac JR; Lipshultz LI
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Mar; 101(3):e14. PubMed ID: 24373494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy.
    Kuang W; Shin PR; Matin S; Thomas AJ
    J Urol; 2004 Jan; 171(1):300-3. PubMed ID: 14665899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laser tissue soldering for hypospadias repair: results of a controlled prospective clinical trial.
    Kirsch AJ; Cooper CS; Gatti J; Scherz HC; Canning DA; Zderic SA; Snyder HM
    J Urol; 2001 Feb; 165(2):574-7. PubMed ID: 11176439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nomogram to preoperatively predict the probability of requiring epididymovasostomy during vasectomy reversal.
    Fenig DM; Kattan MW; Mills JN; Gisbert M; Yu C; Lipshultz LI
    J Urol; 2012 Jan; 187(1):215-8. PubMed ID: 22099990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Comparative study of deferential permeability in rats after microsurgical vasovasotomy using the Howard technique and vasovasotomy using microsurgical low energy CO2 laser].
    Amer M; Cressey C; Ouegnin GA
    Ann Urol (Paris); 1990; 24(5):379-83. PubMed ID: 2252346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Problems unique to microsurgical epididymovasostomy. Comparison of four techniques in a laboratory rat model with review of the literature.
    Stefanović KB; Buncke HJ; Clark SA
    Int Urol Nephrol; 1993; 25(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 8365850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Skin flap closure by dermal laser soldering: a wound healing model for sutureless hypospadias repair.
    Kirsch AJ; Duckett JW; Snyder HM; Canning DA; Harshaw DW; Howard P; Macarak EJ; Zderic SA
    Urology; 1997 Aug; 50(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 9255300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The kinetics of the return of motile sperm to the ejaculate after vasectomy reversal.
    Yang G; Walsh TJ; Shefi S; Turek PJ
    J Urol; 2007 Jun; 177(6):2272-6. PubMed ID: 17509339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.