These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9225623)

  • 21. Generalization of affective learning about faces to perceptually similar faces.
    Verosky SC; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Jun; 21(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 20483821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased.
    Wiese H; Stahl J; Schweinberger SR
    Biol Psychol; 2009 May; 81(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 19428974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Best face forward: similarity effects in repetition priming of face recognition.
    Johnston RA; Barry C
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 May; 54(2):383-96. PubMed ID: 11394053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Perceptual learning and free classification.
    Wills AJ; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 Aug; 51(3):235-70. PubMed ID: 9745383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding.
    Bestelmeyer PE; Jones BC; Debruine LM; Little AC; Perrett DI; Schneider A; Welling LL; Conway CA
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):353-65. PubMed ID: 17870064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acquired prosopagnosia abolishes the face inversion effect.
    Busigny T; Rossion B
    Cortex; 2010 Sep; 46(8):965-81. PubMed ID: 19683710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Investigating the relation between imagery and perception: evidence from face priming.
    Cabeza R; Burton AM; Kelly SW; Akamatsu S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1997 May; 50(2):274-89. PubMed ID: 9225624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
    Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Unconscious familiarity and local context effects on low-level face processing: a reconstruction hypothesis.
    Montoute T; Tiberghien G
    Conscious Cogn; 2001 Dec; 10(4):503-23. PubMed ID: 11790040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Face perception in high-functioning autistic adults: evidence for superior processing of face parts, not for a configural face-processing deficit.
    Lahaie A; Mottron L; Arguin M; Berthiaume C; Jemel B; Saumier D
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Jan; 20(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 16460220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Confounding of norm-based and adaptation effects in brain responses.
    Kahn DA; Aguirre GK
    Neuroimage; 2012 May; 60(4):2294-9. PubMed ID: 22394673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Modulating perceptual learning indexed by the face inversion effect: Simulating the application of transcranial direct current stimulation using the MKM model.
    Civile C; McLaren R; Forrest C; Cooke A; McLaren IPL
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2023 Jul; 49(3):139-150. PubMed ID: 37439742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Face Inversion on Animacy Categorization.
    Balas B; van Lamsweerde AE; Auen A; Saville A
    Iperception; 2017; 8(4):2041669517723653. PubMed ID: 28835814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Categorical effects in the perception of faces.
    Beale JM; Keil FC
    Cognition; 1995 Dec; 57(3):217-39. PubMed ID: 8556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars.
    Corneille O; Goldstone RL; Queller S; Potter T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Apr; 34(3):556-67. PubMed ID: 16933765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Correction to Civile et al. (2023).
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2023 Oct; 49(4):272. PubMed ID: 37589678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Perceived similarity ratings predict generalization success after traditional category learning and a new paired-associate learning task.
    Ashby SR; Bowman CR; Zeithamova D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Aug; 27(4):791-800. PubMed ID: 32472329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition.
    Valentine T
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 May; 43(2):161-204. PubMed ID: 1866456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Identification of gender in domestic-cat faces with and without training: perceptual learning of a natural categorization task.
    Quinn PC; Palmer V; Slater AM
    Perception; 1999; 28(6):749-63. PubMed ID: 10664769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The preferred level of face categorization depends on discriminability.
    D'Lauro C; Tanaka JW; Curran T
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Jun; 15(3):623-9. PubMed ID: 18567265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.