209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9226986)
1. Friend of the court.
Tex Med; 1997 Jul; 93(7):24-6. PubMed ID: 9226986
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Expert medical testimony: responsibilities of medical societies.
McAbee GN
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(2):337; author reply 337. PubMed ID: 16043821
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Rationale for a medical society sponsored expert witness program.
Scarano VR
Tex Med; 1996 Dec; 92(12):80-5. PubMed ID: 8979765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peer reviews. Expert opinions and unsatisfactory professional conduct.
Taylor K
Lamp; 1998 Aug; 55(7):19. PubMed ID: 10025358
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating neurosurgical testimony by non-neurosurgeons: case studies.
Watts C
Surg Neurol; 2009 Apr; 71(4):510-1. PubMed ID: 18482763
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Health Care Complaints Commission and nurses.
Cohen S
Lamp; 1998 Mar; 55(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 10025314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The peer review privilege: what documents are protected from discovery in litigation.
Smart CM
Mo Med; 1998 May; 95(5):205-6. PubMed ID: 9604664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.
Williams MA; Mackin GA; Beresford HR; Gordon J; Jacobson PL; McQuillen MP; Reimschisel TE; Taylor RM; Bernat JL; Rizzo M; Snyder RD; Sagsveen MG; Amery M; Brannon WL;
Neurology; 2006 Jan; 66(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16401838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. FL: does peer review apply to nurses notes?: defendant dr. attempts to invoke peer privilege.
Regan Rep Nurs Law; 1999 Feb; 39(9):3. PubMed ID: 10223027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Promoting better health care: policy arguments for concurrent quality assurance and attorney-client hospital incident report privileges.
Dollar CJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 1993; 3(1):259-308. PubMed ID: 10138438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Tort claims against health care providers for breach of confidentiality.
Lawson CM
Nebr Med J; 1989 Jun; 74(6):150-7. PubMed ID: 2755534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Significance of guidelines by specialty societies as clinical pathway in medicine. Malpractice liability of an indication (BGB section 823)].
Wienke A
HNO; 2003 Oct; 51(10):836-88. PubMed ID: 14971426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Taming the expert: standards and implications of radiologist expert witness testimony.
Muroff JA; Berlin L
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 17411847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evidence: discovery and "medical peer review" committee privileges.
Halpern A
J Law Med Ethics; 2000; 28(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 11317431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Litigation and legislation. You can't say that.
Jerrold L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 22284294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Presidential letter].
Schreiber L
Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 21546227
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of the new civil practice rules on clinical negligence claims.
Brahams D
Med Leg J; 1999; 67(Pt 1):7-8. PubMed ID: 12528414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Much ado about experts.
Borges W
Tex Med; 2002 Dec; 98(12):30-4. PubMed ID: 12515244
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Patients Disciplinary Board, expert knowledge or legal rights].
Møller N; Rungby J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Jun; 165(24):2501-2; author reply 2502. PubMed ID: 12872476
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improper expert medical testimony. Existing and proposed mechanisms of oversight.
McAbee GN
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):257-72. PubMed ID: 9658741
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
