209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9226986)
21. Nurses were illegally barred from review panel. Case on point: Harlet v. St. Vincent Hospitals and Health Svcs, 2001 WL 503459 N.E.2d-IN.
Nurs Law Regan Rep; 2001 Jun; 42(1):4. PubMed ID: 11995401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review: confidentiality and privilege--Part Two.
Devlin MM
J Med Pract Manage; 2001; 16(5):261-3. PubMed ID: 11345885
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Guidelines for testimony for the speciality of interventional pain management.
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 20648199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Ex parte discussions between treating physicians and defense counsel in malpractice and personal injury suits.
Sapp SK
Nebr Med J; 1989 Jun; 74(6):145-9. PubMed ID: 2755533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Guidelines for expert witness testimony in medical malpractice litigation. Committee on Medical Liability. American Academy of Pediatrics.
Pediatrics; 2002 May; 109(5):974-9. PubMed ID: 11986466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. How to protect confidentiality during the contracting process.
Mishek MG; Whitmore MR; Blazevic DJ
QRC Advis; 1995 Feb; 11(4):1-5. PubMed ID: 10140293
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. "The whole truth" versus "the admissible truth": an ethics dilemma for expert witnesses.
Gutheil TG; Hauser M; White MS; Spruiell G; Strasburger LH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2003; 31(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 14974796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Physicians need help in the courts.
Thorson D
Minn Med; 2013 Aug; 96(8):39. PubMed ID: 24490428
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Court recognizes medical expert testimony of nonphysician professional person.
Regan WA
Hosp Prog; 1983 May; 64(5):68, 70. PubMed ID: 10324256
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
Scheutzow SO
Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Discussed with a current case: physician confidentiality issue in conflict].
Paukstadt W
MMW Fortschr Med; 2000; 142(3 Suppl):24-5. PubMed ID: 10893957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Expert judicial opinions in questions of liability].
Quenu L
Chirurgie; 1980; 106(7):555-6. PubMed ID: 7438880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. 19. Autonomy, confidentiality, and quality care in genetic counseling.
Capron AM
Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser; 1979; 15(2):307-40. PubMed ID: 465668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Anatomy of a dental malpractice case: subpoenas and confidentiality.
Plunkett LR
N Y State Dent J; 1997 Feb; 63(2):8-11. PubMed ID: 9090254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A defense viewpoint on jury selection in medical malpractice cases.
Trager L
Med Trial Tech Q; 1981; 27(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 7253849
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Problems in expert testimony and court decisions in malpractice cases following paragraph 8 section 1 and 2 of the German Penal Code].
Bergner R
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1976 Aug; 70(15):856-9. PubMed ID: 983157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Expert or fact witness: is there a legal obligation to testify?
West RW; Sipe CY
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Dec; 1(12):906-7. PubMed ID: 17411731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
Hawkins TS
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An overview of the ACR Committee on Ethics: from hospital contracts to expert witness testimony.
Janower ML; Hoffman TR
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 May; 2(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 17411848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quality assurance activities and the impact of the Quality of Care Information Protection Act, 2004.
Boudreau J
Health Law Can; 2005 Mar; 25(3):45-51. PubMed ID: 15844628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
