These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9227118)

  • 1. State of the art of tooth-colored restoratives.
    Lutz F
    Oper Dent; 1996; 21(6):237-48. PubMed ID: 9227118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age.
    Lutz FU; Krejci I; Oddera M
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 1996 May; 8(4):385-94; quiz 398. PubMed ID: 9028299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dental amalgam--what are the alternatives?
    Tyas MJ
    Int Dent J; 1994 Aug; 44(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7822054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining bonded and cemented restorations: a multitechnique case study.
    Shannon A
    Dent Today; 2000 Apr; 19(4):54, 56, 58-61; quiz 61, 151. PubMed ID: 19750729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Options in restorative dentistry: resin-modified glass ionomers.
    Nazarian A
    Dent Today; 2009 Jul; 28(7):114-5. PubMed ID: 19630283
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A clinical study of the "open sandwich" technique in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2003; 70(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 12762613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1.
    Hilton TJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):198-210. PubMed ID: 12469759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The best of both worlds: combining metal and ceromer for clinical success.
    Martin J; LeBeau S
    Dent Today; 2000 Jul; 19(7):88-9. PubMed ID: 12524824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Alternatives to amalgam.
    Lyons K
    N Z Dent J; 1997 Jun; 93(412):47-50. PubMed ID: 9293745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of cavity preparation and lamination on bond strength and fracture of tooth-colored restorations in primary molars.
    Suwatviroj P; Messer LB; Palamara JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(6):534-40. PubMed ID: 14733466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Therapy of Class V cavities].
    Meissner M; Beetke E
    Stomatol DDR; 1990 Jul; 40(7):290-3. PubMed ID: 2270601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Glass-ionomer cements as base material and dental bonding].
    Blok C
    Tandlaegebladet; 1992 Mar; 96(5):206-14. PubMed ID: 1412038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Combining technologies to improve aesthetics.
    Lowe RA
    Dent Today; 2010 Apr; 29(4):118, 120-3. PubMed ID: 20408289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Anhydrous glass technique.
    Elledge D
    Dent Today; 1997 Nov; 16(11):54, 56, 58-9. PubMed ID: 9560733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of gap size and cement type on gingival microleakage in Class V resin composite inlays.
    Browning WD; Safirstein J
    Quintessence Int; 1997 Aug; 28(8):541-4. PubMed ID: 9477882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.