These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9227118)

  • 21. Tooth-colored filling materials for the restoration of cervical lesions: a 24-month follow-up study.
    Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hinkel R
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):251-8. PubMed ID: 11203827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of two tooth-saving preparation techniques for one-surface cavities.
    Rahimtoola S; van Amerongen E
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2002; 69(1):16-26, 11. PubMed ID: 12119808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Modern alternatives to amalgam: cementable restorations and inlays.
    Wirz J; Jaeger K
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Aug; 30(8):551-6. PubMed ID: 10635268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Preservation-based approaches to restore posterior teeth with amalgam, resin or a combination of materials.
    Baghdadi ZD
    Am J Dent; 2002 Feb; 15(1):54-65. PubMed ID: 12074231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Posterior restorative materials research.
    Eichmiller FC; Marjenhoff WA
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1996 Sep; 24(9):73-6. PubMed ID: 9120616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Esthetic restoration of tooth structure using a nanofill composite system.
    Ward DH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Apr; 26(4):252, 254, 256-7. PubMed ID: 15901083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Restoration with composite inlays. Amalgam substitute: restoration using a direct immediate inlay made of composite].
    Rickli HP; Lutz F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1990; 100(11):1336-43. PubMed ID: 2263938
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical results and new developments of direct posterior restorations.
    Hickel R; Manhart J; García-Godoy F
    Am J Dent; 2000 Nov; 13(Spec No):41D-54D. PubMed ID: 11763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization".
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Märkl A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 11203787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A retrospective look at esthetic resin composite and glass-ionomer Class III restorations: a 2-year clinical evaluation.
    de Araujo MA; Araújo RM; Marsilio AL
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Feb; 29(2):87-93. PubMed ID: 9643241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A conservative approach to patient care.
    Berland L
    Dent Today; 2010 Nov; 29(11):152, 154-5. PubMed ID: 21133032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars.
    García-Godoy F
    Dent Clin North Am; 2000 Jul; 44(3):541-70. PubMed ID: 10925772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Disposable micro air abrasion: a minimally invasive restorative technique.
    Shuman I
    Dent Today; 2007 Jul; 26(7):112, 114-5. PubMed ID: 17708318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT; Munshi AK; Shetty TR
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predictable restoration of Class 2 preparations with composite resin.
    Strassler HE; Trushkowsky RD
    Dent Today; 2004 Jan; 23(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 14969004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Bell system: direct resin methodology.
    Davis MW
    Dent Today; 2001 Feb; 20(2):120-7. PubMed ID: 12524857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Removal of amalgam, glass-ionomer cement and compomer restorations: changes in cavity dimensions and duration of the procedure.
    Szep S; Baum C; Alamouti C; Schmidt D; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 12413228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Minimal intervention dentistry: rationale of cavity design.
    Mount GJ
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 12540125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Surface texture and enamel-restoration interface of glass ionomer restorations.
    Sepet E; Aytepe Z; Oray H
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997; 21(3):231-5. PubMed ID: 9484132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.