103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9227224)
1. Dynamic MR imaging of invasive breast cancer: correlation with tumour grade and other histological factors.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Horsman A
Br J Radiol; 1997 May; 70(833):446-51. PubMed ID: 9227224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prediction of axillary lymph node status in invasive breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Horsman A
Radiology; 1997 May; 203(2):317-21. PubMed ID: 9114081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging of breast cancer and correlation with prognostic factors.
Chang YW; Kwon KH; Choi DL; Lee DW; Lee MH; Lee HK; Yang SB; Kim Y; Seo DY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Nov; 50(9):990-8. PubMed ID: 19863408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is there different correlation with prognostic factors between "non-mass" and "mass" type invasive ductal breast cancers?
Jiang L; Zhou Y; Wang Z; Lu X; Chen M; Zhou C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Sep; 82(9):1404-9. PubMed ID: 23540946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI kinetics of invasive breast cancer: a potential prognostic marker for radiation therapy.
Loiselle CR; Eby PR; DeMartini WB; Peacock S; Bittner N; Lehman CD; Kim JN
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19604652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in determining histopathological prognostic factors of invasive breast cancers.
Tuncbilek N; Karakas HM; Okten OO
Eur J Radiol; 2005 Feb; 53(2):199-205. PubMed ID: 15664283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dynamic MRI of invasive breast cancer: assessment of three region-of-interest analysis methods.
Mussurakis S; Buckley DL; Horsman A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1997; 21(3):431-8. PubMed ID: 9135653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in early breast cancer and their applicability in clinical practice.
Yoshihara E; Smeets A; Laenen A; Reynders A; Soens J; Van Ongeval C; Moerman P; Paridaens R; Wildiers H; Neven P; Christiaens MR
Breast; 2013 Jun; 22(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 23022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Noninvasive nodal staging in patients with breast cancer using gadofosveset-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study.
Schipper RJ; Smidt ML; van Roozendaal LM; Castro CJ; de Vries B; Heuts EM; Keymeulen KB; Wildberger JE; Lobbes MB; Beets-Tan RG
Invest Radiol; 2013 Mar; 48(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 23262788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node micrometastases.
Gipponi M; Canavese G; Lionetto R; Catturich A; Vecchio C; Sapino A; Friedman D; Cafiero F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2006 Mar; 32(2):143-7. PubMed ID: 16300921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The characteristics of the sentinel lymph node metastasis in predicting the axillary lymph node status in patients with breast carcinoma.
Olszewski WP; Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A; Piechocki J; Towpik E; Olszewski WT
Pol J Pathol; 2009; 60(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 20069508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Primary breast abnormalities: selective pixel sampling on dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR images.
Mussurakis S; Gibbs P; Horsman A
Radiology; 1998 Feb; 206(2):465-73. PubMed ID: 9457201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of the axilla in women with breast cancer: comparison with pathology of excised nodes.
Murray AD; Staff RT; Redpath TW; Gilbert FJ; Ah-See AK; Brookes JA; Miller ID; Payne S
Br J Radiol; 2002 Mar; 75(891):220-8. PubMed ID: 11932214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Axillary lymph node metastases in patients with small carcinomas of the breast: is accurate prediction possible?
Anan K; Mitsuyama S; Tamae K; Nishihara K; Iwashita T; Abe Y; Ihara T; Toyoshima S
Eur J Surg; 2000 Aug; 166(8):610-5. PubMed ID: 11003428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rim enhancement of breast cancers on contrast-enhanced MR imaging: relationship with prognostic factors.
Jinguji M; Kajiya Y; Kamimura K; Nakajo M; Sagara Y; Takahama T; Ando M; Rai Y; Sagara Y; Ohi Y; Yoshida H
Breast Cancer; 2006; 13(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 16518064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary tumour characteristics and axillary lymph node status in breast cancer.
Yiangou C; Shousha S; Sinnett HD
Br J Cancer; 1999 Aug; 80(12):1974-8. PubMed ID: 10471048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association between Parenchymal Enhancement of the Contralateral Breast in Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging and Outcome of Patients with Unilateral Invasive Breast Cancer.
van der Velden BH; Dmitriev I; Loo CE; Pijnappel RM; Gilhuijs KG
Radiology; 2015 Sep; 276(3):675-85. PubMed ID: 25811614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The significance of nuclear morphometric variables as prognostic predictors in breast cancer.
Aaltomaa S; Lipponen P; Eskelinen M; Kosma VM; Marin S; Alhava E; Syrjänen K
Anticancer Res; 1991; 11(4):1663-9. PubMed ID: 1746922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in women with lymph node negative invasive breast carcinoma.
Lee AH; Pinder SE; Macmillan RD; Mitchell M; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Blamey RW
Eur J Cancer; 2006 Feb; 42(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 16377180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical significance of breast MRI in the management of ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed on needle biopsy.
Miyashita M; Amano G; Ishida T; Tamaki K; Uchimura F; Ono T; Yajima M; Kuriya Y; Ohuchi N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Jun; 43(6):654-63. PubMed ID: 23592884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
