These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9227259)

  • 21. Accuracy of central axis dose calculations for photon external radiotherapy beams in Finland: the quality of local beam data and the use of averaged data.
    Kapanen M; Sipilä P; Bly R; Järvinen H; Tenhunen M
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Feb; 86(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 18192045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of dose calculation algorithm of the peacock system for multileaf intensity modulation collimator.
    Wu A; Johnson M; Chen AS; Kalnicki S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Dec; 36(5):1225-31. PubMed ID: 8985048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The application of the approximation method of equivalent square for magavoltage photon beams.
    Osman GE; Tsung P
    J Med; 1980; 11(2-3):117-25. PubMed ID: 6774038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quasi-independent monitor unit calculation for intensity modulated sequential tomotherapy.
    Tsai JS; Engler MJ; Liu J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2002; 3(2):135-53. PubMed ID: 11958653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Superficial dose distribution in breast for tangential radiation treatment, Monte Carlo evaluation of Eclipse algorithms in case of phantom and patient geometries.
    Chakarova R; Gustafsson M; Bäck A; Drugge N; Palm Å; Lindberg A; Berglund M
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):102-7. PubMed ID: 21741719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data.
    Storchi P; Woudstra E
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):637-56. PubMed ID: 8730662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of pencil beam and collapsed cone algorithms, in radiotherapy treatment planning for 6 and 10 MV photon.
    Buzdar SA; Afzal M; Todd-Pokropek A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 22338443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental verification of a commercial Monte Carlo-based dose calculation module for high-energy photon beams.
    Künzler T; Fotina I; Stock M; Georg D
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 54(24):7363-77. PubMed ID: 19934489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monte Carlo dose calculation improvements for low energy electron beams using eMC.
    Fix MK; Frei D; Volken W; Neuenschwander H; Born EJ; Manser P
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4577-88. PubMed ID: 20668339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The dosimetric verification of a pencil beam based treatment planning system.
    Knöös T; Ceberg C; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Oct; 39(10):1609-28. PubMed ID: 15551534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Application of AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 23 test package for comparison of two treatment planning systems for photon external beam radiotherapy.
    Alam R; Ibbott GS; Pourang R; Nath R
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):2043-54. PubMed ID: 9434989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dose accuracy check of the 3D electron beam algorithm in a treatment planning system.
    Samuelsson A; Hyödynmaa S; Johansson KA
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Jun; 43(6):1529-44. PubMed ID: 9651023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dose calculation for asymmetric photon fields with independent jaws and multileaf collimators.
    Araki F; Ikeda R; Moribe N; Shirakawa Y; Hatemura M; Shimonobou T; Hirata Y; Takada T; Takahashi M; Matoba M
    Med Phys; 2000 Feb; 27(2):340-5. PubMed ID: 10718137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Estimation of the phantom scatter factor (Sp) of rectangular fields].
    Hayakawa T; Yamada T; Sakai H; Kasahara T; Inoue T; Miyakawa M
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2012; 68(1):15-29. PubMed ID: 22277812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A method for dose calculation for high energy photon beams based on measurements performed at reference depth.
    Bridier A; Dutreix A
    Acta Oncol; 1993; 32(4):425-33. PubMed ID: 8369131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vivo dosimetry during pelvic treatment.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1992 Oct; 25(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 1438930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Correction of enhanced dynamic wedge factor and analysis of monitor unit calculation].
    Huang S; Chen L; Cao W; Sun W; Chen A; Liu B; Wang B
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2015 Feb; 35(2):260-3. PubMed ID: 25736125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Investigation of Estimation Accuracy of Phantom Scatter Factor by Clarkson Method Considering Depth in MLC Irregular Field].
    Hayakawa T; Yamada T; Sakai H; Sasamoto R
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2019; 75(12):1426-1436. PubMed ID: 31866641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.