These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9228813)

  • 1. Psychophysical studies with two binaural cochlear implant subjects.
    van Hoesel RJ; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):495-507. PubMed ID: 9228813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of reference interaural time and intensity differences on binaural performance in listeners with normal and impaired hearing.
    Koehnke J; Culotta CP; Hawley ML; Colburn HS
    Ear Hear; 1995 Aug; 16(4):331-53. PubMed ID: 8549890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.
    Long CJ; Eddington DK; Colburn HS; Rabinowitz WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Sep; 114(3):1565-74. PubMed ID: 14514210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensitivity to interaural envelope correlation changes in bilateral cochlear-implant users.
    Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):335-49. PubMed ID: 25618064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.
    van Hoesel RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Apr; 121(4):2192-206. PubMed ID: 17471733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Suitability of the Binaural Interaction Component for Interaural Electrode Pairing of Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Kollmeier B; Dietz M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():57-64. PubMed ID: 27080646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Psychophysical and speech perception studies: a case report on a binaural cochlear implant subject.
    van Hoesel RJ; Tong YC; Hollow RD; Clark GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Dec; 94(6):3178-89. PubMed ID: 8300953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Limitations on Monaural and Binaural Temporal Processing in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Ihlefeld A; Carlyon RP; Kan A; Churchill TH; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct; 16(5):641-52. PubMed ID: 26105749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaural time difference sensitivity under binaural cochlear implant stimulation persists at high pulse rates up to 900 pps.
    Buck AN; Buchholz S; Schnupp JW; Rosskothen-Kuhl N
    Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):3785. PubMed ID: 36882473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monaural and binaural intensity discrimination in normal and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    Audiology; 1983; 22(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 6615341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Relationship Between Intensity Coding and Binaural Sensitivity in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Todd AE; Goupell MJ; Litovsky RY
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e128-e141. PubMed ID: 27787393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of stimulus bandwidth on binaural loudness summation.
    Shao Z; Mo F; Mao D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1508-14. PubMed ID: 26428788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked discrimination of interaural time delays with narrow-band signal.
    Ito Y; Colburn HS; Thompson CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Dec; 72(6):1821-6. PubMed ID: 7153429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interaural time-delay sensitivity in bilateral cochlear implant users: effects of pulse rate, modulation rate, and place of stimulation.
    van Hoesel RJ; Jones GL; Litovsky RY
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Dec; 10(4):557-67. PubMed ID: 19513792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binaural processing model based on contralateral inhibition. III. Dependence on temporal parameters.
    Breebaart J; van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1105-17. PubMed ID: 11519578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.