These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9228821)

  • 1. Simulation of the effect of threshold elevation and loudness recruitment combined with reduced frequency selectivity on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Nejime Y; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jul; 102(1):603-15. PubMed ID: 9228821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment on the intelligibility of speech in noise.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Vickers DA
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Jun; 29(3):131-43. PubMed ID: 8574199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulation of the effects of loudness recruitment and threshold elevation on the intelligibility of speech in quiet and in a background of speech.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Oct; 94(4):2050-62. PubMed ID: 8227747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the effect of speech-rate slowing on speech intelligibility in noise using a simulation of cochlear hearing loss.
    Nejime Y; Moore BC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jan; 103(1):572-6. PubMed ID: 9440342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Vickers DA; Glasberg BR; Baer T
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Aug; 31(4):227-45. PubMed ID: 9307819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Villchur revisited: another look at automatic gain control simulation of recruiting hearing loss.
    Duchnowski P; Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3170-81. PubMed ID: 8550941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A compact disc containing simulations of hearing impairment.
    Moore BC
    Br J Audiol; 1997 Oct; 31(5):353-7. PubMed ID: 9373744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hearing aid gain for loudness-density normalization in cochlear hearing losses with impaired frequency resolution.
    Leijon A
    Ear Hear; 1991 Aug; 12(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 1783226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relations Between the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise and Psychophysical Measures of Hearing Measured in Four Languages Using the Auditory Profile Test Battery.
    Van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26647417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of Hearing Loss and Fast-Acting Compression on Amplitude Modulation Perception and Speech Intelligibility.
    Wiinberg A; Jepsen ML; Epp B; Dau T
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(1):45-54. PubMed ID: 29668566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Noise-Induced loudness recruitment and hyperacusis: Insufficient central gain in auditory cortex and amygdala.
    Radziwon K; Auerbach BD; Ding D; Liu X; Chen GD; Salvi R
    Neuroscience; 2019 Dec; 422():212-227. PubMed ID: 31669363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
    Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Benefits of linear amplification and multichannel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Stone MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jan; 105(1):400-11. PubMed ID: 9921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness perception in the domestic cat: reaction time estimates of equal loudness contours and recruitment effects.
    May BJ; Little N; Saylor S
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2009 Jun; 10(2):295-308. PubMed ID: 19198944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory filter shapes in normal-hearing, noise-masked normal, and elderly listeners.
    Sommers MS; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2903-14. PubMed ID: 8315154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
    Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.