These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9228837)

  • 1. Initial effects of treatment of Class II malocclusion with the Herren activator, activator-headgear combination, and Jasper Jumper.
    Weiland FJ; Ingervall B; Bantleon HP; Droacht H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 9228837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and cervical headgear appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    de Oliveira JN; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Rodrigues de Almeida M; de Oliveira JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 17628251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentoskeletal changes induced by the Jasper jumper and the activator-headgear combination appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment.
    Lima KJ; Henriques JF; Janson G; Pereira SC; Neves LS; Cançado RH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):684-94. PubMed ID: 23631970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.
    Neves LS; Janson G; Cançado RH; de Lima KJ; Fernandes TM; Henriques JF
    Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):54. PubMed ID: 25182030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Skeletal, dental and soft-tissue changes induced by the Jasper Jumper appliance in late adolescence.
    Nalbantgil D; Arun T; Sayinsu K; Fulya I
    Angle Orthod; 2005 May; 75(3):426-36. PubMed ID: 15898385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The initial effects of the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusions with the van Beek activator compared with the effects of the Herren activator and an activator-headgear combination.
    Altenburger E; Ingervall B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):389-97. PubMed ID: 9753820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapy.
    Herrera FS; Henriques JF; Janson G; Francisconi MF; de Freitas KM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):e77-84. PubMed ID: 21803237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.
    Yao CC; Lai EH; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Treatment of Class II malocclusions with the Jasper Jumper appliance--a preliminary report.
    Weiland FJ; Bantleon HP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Oct; 108(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 7572845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
    Marşan G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of a new removable Jasper Jumper functional appliance vs an activator-headgear combination.
    Sari Z; Goyenc Y; Doruk C; Usumez S
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 12828437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dentoskeletal effects produced by a Jasper Jumper with an anterior bite plane.
    Bassarelli T; Franchi L; Defraia E; Melsen B
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):775-81. PubMed ID: 26927020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Case report: modified use of the Jasper Jumper appliance in a skeletal Class II mixed dentition case requiring palatal expansion.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):277-82. PubMed ID: 9267576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment efficiency in skeletal Class II patients treated with the jasper jumper.
    Küçükkeleş N; Ilhan I; Orgun IA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 May; 77(3):449-56. PubMed ID: 17465652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stability of Class II, division 1 treatment with the headgear-activator combination followed by the edgewise appliance.
    Janson G; Caffer Dde C; Henriques JF; de Freitas MR; Neves LS
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):594-604. PubMed ID: 15529492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal and soft-tissue changes comparison between the Jasper Jumper and Twin Force Bite Corrector in Class II malocclusion patients: A retrospective study.
    Pinelli Henriques Fontes F; Bastiani C; Bellini-Pereira SA; Aliaga-Del Castillo A; Castanha Henriques JF; Janson G
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):286-296. PubMed ID: 32063473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The use of the Jasper Jumper for the correction of Class II malocclusion in the young permanent dentition.
    Stucki N; Ingervall B
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Jun; 20(3):271-81. PubMed ID: 9699405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Dentoskeletal effects of the maxillary splint headgear in the early correction of Class II malocclusion].
    Miguel JAM; Masucci C; Fernandes LQP; Artese F; Franchi L; Giuntini V
    Orthod Fr; 2022 Sep; 93(3):289-300. PubMed ID: 36217587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.