These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9228846)

  • 21. Treatment effects of Herbst appliance in skeletal Class II cases during pre-pubertal and post-pubertal periods: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.
    Farouk K; Eissa O; Ghoneima A; El-Bedwehi A; Abdel-Fattah E; Hussein F; El-Bialy T
    Sci Rep; 2023 Jul; 13(1):11342. PubMed ID: 37443323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mandibular orthopedic advancement in different facial patterns and distinct stages of skeletal maturation.
    Silva FPLD
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2021; 26(2):e21bbo2. PubMed ID: 34008742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Treatment Effects of the Herbst Appliance in Class II Malocclusion Patients after the Growth Peak.
    Cançado RH; Janson G; Tompson B; Alvares JCC; Valarelli FP; Freitas KMS
    Eur J Dent; 2021 Feb; 15(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 32869221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. 3D assessment of mandibular skeletal effects produced by the Herbst appliance.
    Fan Y; Schneider P; Matthews H; Roberts WE; Xu T; Wei R; Claes P; Clement J; Kilpatrick N; Penington A
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):117. PubMed ID: 32299402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluating the treatment effectiveness and efficiency of Carriere Distalizer: a cephalometric and study model comparison of Class II appliances.
    Yin K; Han E; Guo J; Yasumura T; Grauer D; Sameshima G
    Prog Orthod; 2019 Jun; 20(1):24. PubMed ID: 31209589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparative effects of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance in adolescents and adults.
    Furquim BD; Janson G; Cope LCC; Freitas KMS; Henriques JFC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(3):63-72. PubMed ID: 30088567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Severe skeletal Class II Division 1 malocclusion in postpubertal girl treated using Forsus with miniplate anchorage.
    Patil HA; Kerudi VV; Rudagi BM; Sharan JS; Tekale PD
    J Orthod Sci; 2017; 6(4):147-151. PubMed ID: 29119096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Treatment effects of skeletally anchored Forsus FRD EZ and Herbst appliances: A retrospective clinical study.
    Celikoglu M; Buyuk SK; Ekizer A; Unal T
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):306-14. PubMed ID: 26258899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Establishing Cephalometric Norms using Sagittal and Vertical Occlusal Cephalometric Analysis of Pancherz for Dakshina Kannada Children.
    Sahitya M; Shashidhar EP; Chidanandeswara GC; Shetty SK; Kumar YM
    J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jul; 7(7):48-52. PubMed ID: 26229370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stability of Class II fixed functional appliance therapy--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bock NC; von Bremen J; Ruf S
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Apr; 38(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 25820407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Analysis of Class II patients, successfully treated with the straight-wire and Forsus appliances, based on cervical vertebral maturation status.
    Servello DF; Fallis DW; Alvetro L
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):80-6. PubMed ID: 24849243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Mini-implants and the efficiency of Herbst treatment: a preliminary study.
    Luzi C; Luzi V; Melsen B
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Jul; 14():21. PubMed ID: 24325903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Class II division 2 treatment--does skeletal maturity influence success and stability?
    Bock NC; Ruf S
    J Orofac Orthop; 2013 May; 74(3):187-204. PubMed ID: 23652739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector.
    Chhibber A; Upadhyay M; Uribe F; Nanda R
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jul; 83(4):718-27. PubMed ID: 23194014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Immediate Dentofacial Changes in Late Adolescent Patients Treated with the Forsus(™) FRD.
    Gunay EA; Arun T; Nalbantgil D
    Eur J Dent; 2011 Oct; 5(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 22589581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment.
    Konik M; Pancherz H; Hansen K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jul; 112(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 9228846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
    Obijou C; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stability of Class II treatment with an edgewise crowned Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition: Skeletal and dental changes.
    Wigal TG; Dischinger T; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):210-23. PubMed ID: 21803259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Barnett GA; Higgins DW; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):361-9. PubMed ID: 18251608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.