These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9230390)

  • 21. Comparison of cervical, urethral, and urine specimens for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women.
    Sellors JW; Mahony JB; Jang D; Pickard L; Goldsmith CH; Gafni A; Chernesky MA
    J Infect Dis; 1991 Jul; 164(1):205-8. PubMed ID: 2056207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confirmatory assay increases specificity of the chlamydiazyme test for Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.
    Moncada J; Schachter J; Bolan G; Engelman J; Howard L; Mushahwar I; Ridgway G; Mumtaz G; Stamm W; Clark A
    J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Aug; 28(8):1770-3. PubMed ID: 1697602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Use of PCR and direct immunofluorescence microscopy for confirmation of results obtained by Syva MicroTrak Chlamydia enzyme immunoassay.
    Ostergaard L; Møller JK
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 33(10):2620-3. PubMed ID: 8567894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of antigen detection, polymerase chain reaction and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infection.
    Hallsworth PG; Hefford C; Waddell RG; Gordon DL
    Pathology; 1995 Apr; 27(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 7567147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Chlamydiazyme plus blocking assay to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in endocervical specimens.
    Mills RD; Young A; Cain K; Blair TM; Sitorius MA; Woods GL
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1992 Feb; 97(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 1546689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multicenter evaluation of the AMPLICOR and automated COBAS AMPLICOR CT/NG tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Van Der Pol B; Quinn TC; Gaydos CA; Crotchfelt K; Schachter J; Moncada J; Jungkind D; Martin DH; Turner B; Peyton C; Jones RB
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Mar; 38(3):1105-12. PubMed ID: 10699004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in routine clinical practice: increased sensitivity of cell culture in comparison with the microimmunofluorescence test].
    Sterzik K; Rosenbusch B; Danner B; Heeg KM; Wolf A; Lauritzen C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Dec; 48(12):881-3. PubMed ID: 3069566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining and an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay for identifying Chlamydia trachomatis in cervical and urethral specimens.
    Wiesmeier E; Bruckner DA; Malotte CK; Downie A
    J Reprod Med; 1989 Aug; 34(8):517-9. PubMed ID: 2681749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of first void urine and urogenital swab specimens for detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Chlamydia trachomatis by polymerase chain reaction in patients attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic.
    Jensen JS; Björnelius E; Dohn B; Lidbrink P
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 Aug; 31(8):499-507. PubMed ID: 15273584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of the Clearview Chlamydia, the PACE 2 assay, and culture for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from cervical specimens in a low-prevalence population.
    Blanding J; Hirsch L; Stranton N; Wright T; Aarnaes S; de la Maza L; Peterson EM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Jun; 31(6):1622-5. PubMed ID: 8315006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of an automated enzyme immunoassay with a direct fluorescent antibody test and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in diagnostic specimens from male patients.
    Tong CY; Valentine C; Arya OP
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1996 Apr; 15(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 8781887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis test versus culture in genital samples in various prevalence populations.
    de Barbeyrac B; Pellet I; Dutilh B; Bébéar C; Dumon B; Géniaux M; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1994 Jun; 70(3):162-6. PubMed ID: 8039778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of a monoclonal antibody test to detect chlamydia in cervical and urethral specimens.
    Forbes BA; Bartholoma N; McMillan J; Roefaro M; Weiner L; Welych L
    J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Jun; 23(6):1136-7. PubMed ID: 3711304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ; Schouls LM; Pijl A; Cairo I; Buimer M; Bruisten S
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of two enzyme immunoassays and an immunofluorescence test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Grillner L; Beckman S; Hammar H
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1986 Oct; 5(5):559-62. PubMed ID: 3536502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of urine testing in evaluations of the sensitivity of the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay on endocervical swabs for Chlamydia trachomatis and neisseria gonorrhoeae: the infected patient standard reduces sensitivity of single site evaluation.
    Moncada J; Schachter J; Hook EW; Ferrero D; Gaydos C; Quinn TC; Willis D; Weissfeld A; Martin DH
    Sex Transm Dis; 2004 May; 31(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 15107628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. PCR and direct fluorescent-antibody staining confirm Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in swabs and urine below the detection threshold of Chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay.
    Krepel J; Laur I; Sproston A; Luinstra K; Jang D; Mahony J; Chernesky M
    J Clin Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 33(11):2847-9. PubMed ID: 8576331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by ligase chain reaction-based assays with clinical specimens from various sites: implications for diagnostic testing and screening.
    Buimer M; van Doornum GJ; Ching S; Peerbooms PG; Plier PK; Ram D; Lee HH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):2395-400. PubMed ID: 8880487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Inhibition of PCR in genital and urine specimens submitted for Chlamydia trachomatis testing.
    Toye B; Woods W; Bobrowska M; Ramotar K
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Aug; 36(8):2356-8. PubMed ID: 9666023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitive immune dot blot test for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
    Mearns G; Richmond SJ; Storey CC
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Sep; 26(9):1810-3. PubMed ID: 3183026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.