1110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9230568)
1. Human experimentation. Protecting patient autonomy through informed consent.
Tuthill KA
J Leg Med; 1997 Jun; 18(2):221-50. PubMed ID: 9230568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The standard of disclosure in human subject experimentation.
Morin K
J Leg Med; 1998 Jun; 19(2):157-221. PubMed ID: 9658739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Informed consent in human experimentation: bridging the gap between ethical thought and current practice.
Delgado R; Leskovac H
UCLA Law Rev; 1986 Oct; 34(1):67-130. PubMed ID: 11659049
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Considering experimentation and elusive truth: informed consent made difficult.
Brodeur D
Issues (St Louis Mo); 1992; 7(2):1-8. PubMed ID: 11659444
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Power, advocacy, and informed consent forms.
Smith ML
J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11653311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Innovative therapy. The responsibility of hospitals.
Cowan DH; Bertsch E
J Leg Med; 1984 Jun; 5(2):219-51. PubMed ID: 6611383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cognitively impaired subjects. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med; 1989 Nov; 111(10):843-8. PubMed ID: 2683918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human experimentation and human rights.
Katz J
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):7-54. PubMed ID: 11656326
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects.
Owens JF
Med Trial Tech Q; 1987; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Monetary inducement to research participation.
Palmer WE
Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 3975268
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulation of psychiatric research: a socioethical analysis.
Tancredi LR; Maxfield CT
Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983; 6(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 6642824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An overview of legal controls on human experimentation and the regulatory implications of taking Professor Katz seriously.
Goldner JA
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):63-134. PubMed ID: 11656325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Regulating research on the terminally ill: a proposal for heightened safeguards.
Addicott DC
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1999; 15(2):479-524. PubMed ID: 10394764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent.
Hooker EZ
SCI Nurs; 1992 Aug; 9(3):86-91. PubMed ID: 1519042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
Pellegrino ED
St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects.
Macklin R
IRB; 1989; 11(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11650284
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Constraints on experimentation: protecting children to death.
Holder AR
Yale Law Policy Rev; 1988; 6(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 11650241
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy.
Moore DL
Albany Law Rev; 1994; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent: nursing issues and ethical dilemmas.
Chamorro T; Appelbaum J
Oncol Nurs Forum; 1988; 15(6):803-8. PubMed ID: 3205839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
