185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9231963)
1. The effect of bone quality on pedicle screw loading in axial instability. A synthetic model.
McLain RF; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; Smith TS; Sarigul-Klijn N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1454-60. PubMed ID: 9231963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of surgical technique on intravertebral and intrapedicular bending moments.
McKinley TO; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Sharkey NA; Sarigul-Klijn N; Smith TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(1):18-24, discussion 25. PubMed ID: 9921586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of sagittal insertion angle on intrapedicular bending moments.
Youssef JA; McKinley TO; Yerby SA; McLain RF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jun; 24(11):1077-81. PubMed ID: 10361656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of pedicle morphometry on pedicle screw loading. A synthetic model.
McKinley TO; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Sarigul-Klijn N; Smith TS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Feb; 22(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 9051885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-segment pedicle instrumentation. Biomechanical analysis of supplemental hook fixation.
Chiba M; McLain RF; Yerby SA; Moseley TA; Smith TS; Benson DR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Feb; 21(3):288-94. PubMed ID: 8742203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Loading of pedicle screws within the vertebra.
Yerby SA; Ehteshami JR; McLain RF
J Biomech; 1997 Sep; 30(9):951-4. PubMed ID: 9302618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An experimental study of lumbar destabilization. Restabilization and bone density.
Bennett GJ; Serhan HA; Sorini PM; Willis BH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jul; 22(13):1448-53. PubMed ID: 9231962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of translaminar facet joint fixation. A comparative study of poly-L-lactide pins, screws, and pedicle fixation.
Deguchi M; Cheng BC; Sato K; Matsuyama Y; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(12):1307-12; discussion 1313. PubMed ID: 9654619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.
Gerber M; Crawford NR; Chamberlain RH; Fifield MS; LeHuec JC; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(7):762-8. PubMed ID: 16582849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.
Lim TH; Kim JG; Fujiwara A; Yoon TT; Lee SC; Ha JW; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Nov; 26(22):2498-503. PubMed ID: 11707718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic lumbar pedicle screw-rod stabilization: in vitro biomechanical comparison with standard rigid pedicle screw-rod stabilization.
Bozkuş H; Senoğlu M; Baek S; Sawa AG; Ozer AF; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Feb; 12(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 20121354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of costotransverse process screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation of the upper thoracic spine.
Little AS; Brasiliense LB; Lazaro BC; Reyes PM; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Neurosurgery; 2010 Mar; 66(3 Suppl Operative):178-82; discussion 182. PubMed ID: 20173568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do facet screws provide the required stability in lumbar fixation? A biomechanical comparison of the Boucher technique and pedicular fixation in primary and circumferential fusions.
Agarwala A; Bucklen B; Muzumdar A; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Jan; 27(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21849224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical assessment of infra-laminar hooks as an alternative to supra-laminar hooks in thoracolumbar fixation.
Murakami H; Tsai KJ; Attallah-Wasif ES; Yamazaki K; Shimamura T; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(9):967-71. PubMed ID: 16641771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of specimen fixation method on pullout tests of pedicle screws.
Pfeiffer M; Gilbertson LG; Goel VK; Griss P; Keller JC; Ryken TC; Hoffman HE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 May; 21(9):1037-44. PubMed ID: 8724087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedicle screw augmentation with polyethylene tape: a biomechanical study in the osteoporotic thoracolumbar spine.
Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 20051920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validation of an improved method to calculate the orientation and magnitude of pedicle screw bending moments.
Freeman AL; Fahim MS; Bechtold JE
J Biomech Eng; 2012 Oct; 134(10):104502. PubMed ID: 23083202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
