These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9232396)

  • 1. Digital mammography using storage phosphor plate technique--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Kvist H
    Eur J Radiol; 1997 May; 24(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 9232396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of visual grading and free-response ROC analyses for assessment of image-processing algorithms in digital mammography.
    Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Claus F; Jacobs J; Oyen R; Bosmans H
    Br J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 85(1020):e1233-41. PubMed ID: 22844032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Digital magnification mammography in computed radiography. Initial clinical results].
    Hundertmark C; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Funke M; Wiese M; von Heyden D; Grabbe E
    Radiologe; 1997 Aug; 37(8):597-603. PubMed ID: 9411475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The diagnostic accuracy of a digital mammography system with photostimulable storage phosphors used with automatic reading].
    Panizza P; Rodighiero MG; De Gaspari A; Tacchini S; Camalori M; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1996; 91(1-2):46-51. PubMed ID: 8614730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study.
    Funke M; Breiter N; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW; Grabbe E
    Br J Radiol; 1998 May; 71(845):528-34. PubMed ID: 9691898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative study of physical image quality in digital and synthetic mammography from commercially available mammography systems.
    Baldelli P; Bertolini M; Contillo A; Della Gala G; Golinelli P; Pagan L; Rivetti S; Taibi A
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 63(16):165020. PubMed ID: 29972144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental studies on image quality in conventional film screen system, digital phosphor storage plate mammography in mangnification technique and digital mammography in CCD-technique].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):965-8. PubMed ID: 11199438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
    Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Diagnostic value of full-field digital mammography for breast carcinoma].
    Ding JH; Peng WJ; Jiang ZX; Xu LH; Hu DT; Zheng XJ
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 31(11):854-7. PubMed ID: 20137352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Digital mammography with high-resolution storage plates (CR) versus full-field digital mammography (CCD) (DR) for microcalcifications and focal lesions -- a retrospective clinical histologic analysis (n = 102)].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Lell M; Wenkel E; Böhner C; Dassel MS; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2005 Jan; 177(1):67-71. PubMed ID: 15657822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Can digital breast tomosynthesis replace conventional diagnostic mammography views for screening recalls without calcifications? A comparison study in a simulated clinical setting.
    Brandt KR; Craig DA; Hoskins TL; Henrichsen TL; Bendel EC; Brandt SR; Mandrekar J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Feb; 200(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 23345348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms.
    Davies DH; Dance DR
    Phys Med Biol; 1990 Aug; 35(8):1111-8. PubMed ID: 2217536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Lell M; Kuchar I; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Digital storage phosphor mammography in a magnification technic: experimental studies for spatial resolution and for detection of microcalcifications].
    Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Hundertmark C; Sachs J; Gruhl T; Sperner W; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 1997 Aug; 167(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9333359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
    Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital chest radiography--optimizing image processing parameters for the visibility of chest lesions and anatomy.
    Kheddache S; Denbratt L; Angelhed JE
    Eur J Radiol; 1996 Jun; 22(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 8832241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.