155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9232508)
1. Children and bioethics: uses and abuses of the best-interests standard.
Kopelman LM
J Med Philos; 1997 Jun; 22(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 9232508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Parenting and the best interests of minors.
Downie RS; Randall F
J Med Philos; 1997 Jun; 22(3):219-31. PubMed ID: 9232509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The best-interests standard as threshold, ideal, and standard of reasonableness.
Kopelman LM
J Med Philos; 1997 Jun; 22(3):271-89. PubMed ID: 9232512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family.
Baron CH
Fam Law Q; 1983; 17(1):1-40. PubMed ID: 11658459
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical decision making for and by children: tensions between parent, state, and child.
Wadlington W
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1994; 2():311-36. PubMed ID: 11659988
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re L.H.R.
Paulus SM
Issues Law Med; 1985 Nov; 1(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 11644498
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Withholding medical treatment from infants: when is it child neglect?
Knepper K
Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1994-1995 Winter; 33(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11653286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Research with children.
Glantz LH
Am J Law Med; 1998; 24(2-3):213-44. PubMed ID: 9702273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-treatment in the best interests of the child: a case commentary of Couture-Jacquet v. Montreal Children's Hospital.
Keyserlingk EW
McGill Law J; 1987 Mar; 32(2):413-36. PubMed ID: 11649873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Neonatal and pediatric critical care: ethical decision making.
Cooper R; Koch KA
Crit Care Clin; 1996 Jan; 12(1):149-64. PubMed ID: 8821016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ethical issues in pediatrics.
Weil WB
Curr Probl Pediatr; 1989 Dec; 19(12):617-98. PubMed ID: 2692975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of children in making health care decisions: a comparative approach.
Broyde CS
Natl Jew Law Rev; 1987; 2():123-35. PubMed ID: 11658826
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The adequacy of medical ethics education in a pediatrics training program.
Waz WR; Henkind J
Acad Med; 1995 Nov; 70(11):1041-3. PubMed ID: 7575934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minors, medical treatment, and interspousal disagreement: should Solomon split the child?
Feigenbaum MS
De Paul Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):841-84. PubMed ID: 11659593
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Minors and health care - who decides?
Buxbaum ER; Hirsh HL
Med Law; 1983; 2(4):335-46. PubMed ID: 6687085
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Future ethical issues in neonatology: a Japanese perspective.
Nishida H
Semin Perinatol; 1987 Jul; 11(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 3616662
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients.
Francis LP
Utah Law Rev; 1992; 1992(3):861-90. PubMed ID: 11656535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Canada: conflict as well as consensus.
Roy DJ; Williams JR
Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S32-4. PubMed ID: 11644030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Legal trends in bioethics.
Davis D
J Clin Ethics; 1995; 6(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 11644735
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Consent in paediatrics: a complex teaching assignment.
Grant VJ
J Med Ethics; 1991 Dec; 17(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 1787521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
