These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9232760)

  • 1. Bias in the evaluation of DNA-amplification tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Hadgu A
    Stat Med; 1997 Jun; 16(12):1391-9. PubMed ID: 9232760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The discrepancy in discrepant analysis.
    Hadgu A
    Lancet; 1996 Aug; 348(9027):592-3. PubMed ID: 8774575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by ligase chain reaction compared with polymerase chain reaction and cell culture in urogenital specimens.
    de Barbeyrac B; Rodriguez P; Dutilh B; Le Roux P; Bébéar C
    Genitourin Med; 1995 Dec; 71(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8566978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relative accuracy of nucleic acid amplification tests and culture in detecting Chlamydia in asymptomatic men.
    Cheng H; Macaluso M; Vermund SH; Hook EW
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Nov; 39(11):3927-37. PubMed ID: 11682509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of ligase chain reaction to polymerase chain reaction in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis endocervical infections.
    Davis JD; Riley PK; Peters CW; Rand KH
    Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol; 1998; 6(2):57-60. PubMed ID: 9702586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.
    Hadgu A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Dec; 52(12):1231-7. PubMed ID: 10580787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of bias in diagnostic-test sensitivity and specificity estimates computed by discrepant analysis.
    Green TA; Black CM; Johnson RE
    J Clin Microbiol; 1998 Feb; 36(2):375-81. PubMed ID: 9466744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimised sample DNA preparation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial tissue by polymerase chain reaction and ligase chain reaction.
    Freise J; Gérard HC; Bunke T; Whittum-Hudson JA; Zeidler H; Köhler L; Hudson AP; Kuipers JG
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Feb; 60(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 11156547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital swabs: comparison of commercial and in house amplification methods with culture.
    Shattock RM; Patrizio C; Simmonds P; Sutherland S
    Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Aug; 74(4):289-93. PubMed ID: 9924472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of a ligase chain reaction test kit for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Miyashita N; Matsumoto A; Niki Y; Matsushima T
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Jun; 49(6):515-7. PubMed ID: 8763272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ligase chain reaction to detect Chlamydia trachomatis infection of the cervix.
    Schachter J; Stamm WE; Quinn TC; Andrews WW; Burczak JD; Lee HH
    J Clin Microbiol; 1994 Oct; 32(10):2540-3. PubMed ID: 7814494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of screening tests for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis: bias associated with the patient-infected-status algorithm.
    Hadgu A; Dendukuri N; Wang L
    Epidemiology; 2012 Jan; 23(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 22157304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ligase chain reaction in detection of Chlamydia DNA in synovial fluid cells.
    Nikkari S; Puolakkainen M; Yli-Kerttula U; Luukkainen R; Lehtonen OP; Toivanen P
    Br J Rheumatol; 1997 Jul; 36(7):763-5. PubMed ID: 9255110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A school-based Chlamydia control program using DNA amplification technology.
    Cohen DA; Nsuami M; Etame RB; Tropez-Sims S; Abdalian S; Farley TA; Martin DH
    Pediatrics; 1998 Jan; 101(1):E1. PubMed ID: 9417165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of amplicor chlamydia PCR and LCX chlamydia LCR to detect Chlamydia trachomatis in synovial fluid.
    Kuipers JG; Andresen J; Köhler L; Schnarr S; Putschky N; Zeidler H; Wollenhaupt J
    Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2002; 20(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 12051397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in the sensitivity of the Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis PCR assay.
    Ossewaarde JM; van Doornum GJ; Buimer M; Choueiri B; Stary A
    Genitourin Med; 1997 Jun; 73(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 9306903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infection in women by ligase chain reaction assay of urine.
    Lee HH; Chernesky MA; Schachter J; Burczak JD; Andrews WW; Muldoon S; Leckie G; Stamm WE
    Lancet; 1995 Jan; 345(8944):213-6. PubMed ID: 7823713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Development of a gap ligase chain reaction for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in newborn infants].
    Wei H; Wu SX; Yu JL; Yang J; Liu GX
    Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 41(8):578-81. PubMed ID: 14744376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of nested and ELISA based polymerase chain reaction assays for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women with preterm complications.
    Sulaiman S; Chong PP; Mokhtarudin R; Lye MS; Wan Hassan WH
    Trop Biomed; 2014 Mar; 31(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 24862043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The inhibitory effect of phosphate on the ligase chain reaction used for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Notomi T; Ikeda Y; Okadome A; Nagayama A
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Apr; 51(4):306-8. PubMed ID: 9659244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.