173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9233591)
1. Stem cell mobilization in resistant or relapsed lymphoma: superior yield of progenitor cells following a salvage regimen comprising ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin compared to intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide.
McQuaker IG; Haynes AP; Stainer C; Anderson S; Russell NH
Br J Haematol; 1997 Jul; 98(1):228-33. PubMed ID: 9233591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mobilisation of peripheral blood stem cells with IVE and G-CSF improves CD34+ cell yields and engraftment in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin's disease.
McQuaker I; Haynes A; Stainer C; Byrne J; Russell N
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Oct; 24(7):715-22. PubMed ID: 10516673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-Modified Ifosfamide, Epirubicin, and Etoposide is a Safe and Effective Salvage Therapy with High Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization Capacity for Poorly Mobilized Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Patients.
Fukunaga A; Hyuga M; Iwasaki M; Nakae Y; Kishimoto W; Maesako Y; Arima N
J Clin Exp Hematop; 2016; 56(1):50-4. PubMed ID: 27334858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.
Reiser M; Josting A; Draube A; Mapara MY; Scheid C; Chemnitz J; Tesch H; Wolf J; Diehl V; Söhngen D; Engert A
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jun; 23(12):1223-8. PubMed ID: 10414907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. IVE (ifosfamide, epirubicin and etoposide) is a more effective stem cell mobilisation regimen than ICE (ifosphamide, carboplatin and etoposide) in the context of salvage therapy for lymphoma.
Fox CP; McMillan AK; Bishton MJ; Haynes AP; Russell NH
Br J Haematol; 2008 Apr; 141(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 18353164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of chemotherapy regimen and hematopoietic growth factor on mobilization and collection of peripheral blood stem cells in cancer patients.
Nowrousian MR; Waschke S; Bojko P; Welt A; Schuett P; Ebeling P; Flasshove M; Moritz T; Schuette J; Seeber S
Ann Oncol; 2003; 14 Suppl 1():i29-36. PubMed ID: 12736228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clonogenic potential and phenotypic analysis of CD34+ cells mobilized by different chemotherapy regimens.
Cesana C; Regazzi E; Garau D; Caramatti C; Mangoni L; Rizzoli V
Haematologica; 1999 Sep; 84(9):771-8. PubMed ID: 10477448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors influencing collection of peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma.
Demirer T; Buckner CD; Gooley T; Appelbaum FR; Rowley S; Chauncey T; Lilleby K; Storb R; Bensinger WI
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1996 Jun; 17(6):937-41. PubMed ID: 8807097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Progenitor-cell mobilization after low-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: an analysis of progenitor-cell quantity and quality and factors predicting for these parameters in 101 pretreated patients with malignant lymphoma.
Watts MJ; Sullivan AM; Jamieson E; Pearce R; Fielding A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC
J Clin Oncol; 1997 Feb; 15(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 9053475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF.
Koç ON; Gerson SL; Cooper BW; Laughlin M; Meyerson H; Kutteh L; Fox RM; Szekely EM; Tainer N; Lazarus HM
J Clin Oncol; 2000 May; 18(9):1824-30. PubMed ID: 10784622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blood progenitor cell (BPC) mobilization studied in multiple myeloma, solid tumor and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients after combination chemotherapy and G-CSF.
Engelhardt M; Winkler J; Waller C; Lange W; Mertelsmann R; Henschler R
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1997 Mar; 19(6):529-37. PubMed ID: 9181898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors determining pbsc mobilization efficiency and nonmobilization following ICE with or without rituximab (R-ICE) salvage therapy for refractory or relapsed lymphoma prior to autologous transplantation.
Xia W; Ma CK; Reid C; Bai L; Wong K; Kerridge I; Ward C; Greenwood M
J Clin Apher; 2014 Dec; 29(6):322-30. PubMed ID: 24944079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High-dose therapy followed by autologous peripheral-blood stem-cell transplantation for patients with Hodgkin's disease and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma using unprimed and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral-blood stem cells.
Nademanee A; Sniecinski I; Schmidt GM; Dagis AC; O'Donnell MR; Snyder DS; Parker PM; Stein AS; Smith EP; Molina A
J Clin Oncol; 1994 Oct; 12(10):2176-86. PubMed ID: 7523609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ESHAP and G-CSF is a superior blood stem cell mobilizing regimen compared to cyclophosphamide 1.5 g m(-2) and G-CSF for pre-treated lymphoma patients: a matched pairs analysis of 78 patients.
Watts MJ; Ings SJ; Leverett D; MacMillan A; Devereux S; Goldstone AH; Linch DC
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jan; 82(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 10646877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-dose etoposide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor as an effective chemomobilization regimen for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with non-Hodgkin Lymphoma previously treated with CHOP-based chemotherapy: a study from the Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma.
Hyun SY; Cheong JW; Kim SJ; Min YH; Yang DH; Ahn JS; Lee WS; Ryoo HM; Do YR; Lee HS; Lee JH; Oh SY; Suh C; Yhim HY; Kim JS
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2014 Jan; 20(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 24141009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization by chemotherapy with and without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Schwartzberg LS; Birch R; Hazelton B; Tauer KW; Lee P; Altemose R; George C; Blanco R; Wittlin F; Cohen J
J Hematother; 1992; 1(4):317-27. PubMed ID: 1285381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ifosphamide, etoposide and epirubicin is an effective combined salvage and peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and Hodgkin disease.
Bishton MJ; Lush RJ; Byrne JL; Russell NH; Shaw BE; Haynes AP
Br J Haematol; 2007 Mar; 136(5):752-61. PubMed ID: 17313378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation between granulocyte/macrophage-colony-forming units and CD34+ cells in apheresis products from patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor to mobilize peripheral blood progenitor cells.
Vogel W; Kunert C; Blumenstengel K; Fricke HJ; Kath R; Sayer HG; Höffken K
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 1998; 124(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 9692843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with breast cancer: a prospective randomized trial comparing rhG-CSF with the combination of rhG-CSF plus rhEpo after VIP-E chemotherapy.
Waller CF; von Lintig F; Daskalakis A; Musahl V; Lange W
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jul; 24(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10435729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
