131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9234913)
1. Comparison of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopic screening of exfoliated cervical cells with standard Papanicolaou screening.
Fung Kee Fung M; Senterman M; Eid P; Faught W; Mikhael NZ; Wong PT
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jul; 66(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9234913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Natural history of false-negative papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology.
Mannino JR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):542-6. PubMed ID: 9821735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detailed account of confounding factors in interpretation of FTIR spectra of exfoliated cervical cells.
Wong PT; Senterman MK; Jackli P; Wong RK; Salib S; Campbell CE; Feigel R; Faught W; Fung Kee Fung M
Biopolymers; 2002; 67(6):376-86. PubMed ID: 12209445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between Pap smear cytology and FTIR spectroscopy: a new tool for screening for cervical cancer.
El-Tawil SG; Adnan R; Muhamed ZN; Othman NH
Pathology; 2008 Oct; 40(6):600-3. PubMed ID: 18752127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of a self-administered tampon ThinPrep test with conventional pap smears for cervical cytology.
Budge M; Halford J; Haran M; Mein J; Wright G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jun; 45(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 15904447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. DCS liquid-based system is more effective than conventional smears to diagnosis of cervical lesions: study in high-risk population with biopsy-based confirmation.
Longatto Filho A; Pereira SM; Di Loreto C; Utagawa ML; Makabe S; Sakamoto Maeda MY; Marques JA; Santoro CL; Castelo A
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 May; 97(2):497-500. PubMed ID: 15863150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of combined colposcopy and cytology in cervical pathology.
Tamiolakis D; Kalloniatou M; Lambropoulou M; Kambanieris M; Tsopelas A; Daskalakis G; Nikolaidou S; Venizelos I; Papadopoulos N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2005 Nov; 273(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 16041607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of concurrent Papanicolaou smear at time of cervical biopsy.
Panos JC; Jones BA; Mazzara PF
Diagn Cytopathol; 2001 Oct; 25(4):270-3. PubMed ID: 11599115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Classification of cervical cancer cells using FTIR data.
Njoroge E; Alty SR; Gani MR; Alkatib M
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5338-41. PubMed ID: 17945893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False positive cervical cytology: an important reason for colposcopy.
Feldman MJ; Seeve CC; Srebnik E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Sep; 129(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 900175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of preoperative exfoliative cervical cytology with subsequent histology.
Parker A; Ueki M
N Z Med J; 1986 Jun; 99(803):414-6. PubMed ID: 3461355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cytological screening: Assessment of the Fournier ® self-sampling device in a cervical pathology outpatient clinic.
da Silva Rocha A; Guilherme Schaefer P; Isabel Albano Edelweiss M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Oct; 43(10):802-9. PubMed ID: 26223029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting structural changes at the molecular level with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. A potential tool for prescreening preinvasive lesions of the cervix.
Yazdi HM; Bertrand MA; Wong PT
Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(4):664-8. PubMed ID: 8693883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Colposcopic survey of Papanicolaou test-negative cases with hyperkeratosis or parakeratosis.
Cecchini S; Iossa A; Ciatto S; Bonardi L; Confortini M; Cipparrone G
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Nov; 76(5 Pt 1):857-9. PubMed ID: 2170888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of visual inspection of cervix and Pap smear for cervical cancer screening.
Tayyeb R; Khawaja NP; Malik N
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2003 Apr; 13(4):201-3. PubMed ID: 12718787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The role of colposcopy in evaluation of the cervix for unexpectedly positive pap smears].
Jesień-Sokołowska U; Madej JG
Przegl Lek; 1999; 56(1):17-9. PubMed ID: 10375918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing visual inspection with acetic acid plus random cervical biopsy plus endocervical curettage to colposcopic directed biopsy plus endocervical curettage in detecting cervical lesions in low-resource settings.
Puntachai P; Darojn D; Chumworathayi B; Chaousriku W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2011; 12(10):2665-8. PubMed ID: 22320971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
