351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9236649)
1. Medical abortion or vacuum aspiration? Two year follow up of a patient preference trial.
Howie FL; Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):829-33. PubMed ID: 9236649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.
Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
BMJ; 1993 Sep; 307(6906):714-7. PubMed ID: 8401094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychological responses following medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) and surgical vacuum aspiration. A patient-centered, partially randomised prospective study.
Henshaw R; Naji S; Russell I; Templeton A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1994 Nov; 73(10):812-8. PubMed ID: 7817735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of medical and surgical termination of pregnancy: choice, emotional impact and satisfaction with care.
Slade P; Heke S; Fletcher J; Stewart P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Dec; 105(12):1288-95. PubMed ID: 9883920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of medical abortion (using mifepristone and gemeprost) with surgical vacuum aspiration: efficacy and early medical sequelae.
Henshaw RC; Naji SA; Russell IT; Templeton AA
Hum Reprod; 1994 Nov; 9(11):2167-72. PubMed ID: 7868693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh.
Cameron ST; Glasier AF; Logan J; Benton L; Baird DT
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Dec; 103(12):1222-9. PubMed ID: 8968240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical abortion in women of less than or equal to 56 days amenorrhoea: a comparison between gemeprost (a PGE1 analogue) alone and mifepristone and gemeprost.
Norman JE; Thong KJ; Rodger MW; Baird DT
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 Jul; 99(7):601-6. PubMed ID: 1525104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of abortion in early pregnancy with mifepristone in conjunction with gemeprost.
Somell C; Olund A
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1993 Jan; 72(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 8382430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized trial of misoprostol and cervagem in combination with a reduced dose of mifepristone for induction of abortion.
Baird DT; Sukcharoen N; Thong KJ
Hum Reprod; 1995 Jun; 10(6):1521-7. PubMed ID: 7593528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomised study of two doses of gemeprost in combination with mifepristone for induction of abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Thong KJ; Lynch P; Baird DT
Contraception; 1996 Aug; 54(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 8842586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Psychiatric morbidity and acceptability following medical and surgical methods of induced abortion.
Urquhart DR; Templeton AA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Apr; 98(4):396-9. PubMed ID: 2031899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pre-operative cervical preparation before first trimester vacuum aspiration: a randomized controlled comparison between gemeprost and mifepristone (RU 486).
Henshaw RC; Templeton AA
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Oct; 98(10):1025-30. PubMed ID: 1751434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Further acceptability evaluation of RU486 and ONO 802 as abortifacient agents in a Chinese population.
Tang GW; Lau OW; Yip P
Contraception; 1993 Sep; 48(3):267-76. PubMed ID: 8222656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 'Let the computer choose?': the experience of participants in a randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy.
Lie M; May C; Kelly T; Robson S
Sociol Health Illn; 2012 Jun; 34(5):746-60. PubMed ID: 22118291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Women's evaluation of three early abortion methods.
Holmgren K
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1992 Dec; 71(8):616-23. PubMed ID: 1336921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mifepristone or vacuum aspiration in termination of early pregnancy.
Legarth J; Peen UB; Michelsen JW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1991 Sep; 41(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 1936497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A pilot study of acceptability of RU486 and ONO 802 in a Chinese population.
Tang GW
Contraception; 1991 Nov; 44(5):523-32. PubMed ID: 1797467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Early pregnancy termination: a comparison between vacuum aspiration and medical abortion using prostaglandin (16,16 dimethyl-trans-delta 2-PGE1 methyl ester) or the antiprogestogen RU 486.
Cameron IT; Baird DT
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 Mar; 95(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 3370199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The abortifacient effect of misoprostol in the second trimester. A randomized comparison with gemeprost in patients pre-treated with mifepristone (RU486).
el-Refaey H; Hinshaw K; Templeton A
Hum Reprod; 1993 Oct; 8(10):1744-6. PubMed ID: 8300840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
