These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9237149)

  • 21. Use of Pindex system in fabrication of the sectional custom tray.
    Jabbari E; Savabi O; Nejatidanesh F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jul; 23(5):417-9. PubMed ID: 24417537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fabrication of a custom impression tray using a thermoplastic material as the tray spacer.
    Barrero C; Purdy M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):406-7. PubMed ID: 16198183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A laboratory study of dimensional changes for three elastomeric impression materials using custom and stock trays.
    Boulton JL; Gage JP; Vincent PF; Basford KE
    Aust Dent J; 1996 Dec; 41(6):398-404. PubMed ID: 9008997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Current concepts and techniques in complete denture final impression procedures.
    Petropoulos VC; Rashedi B
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Dec; 12(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 15061238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The laminar impression technique.
    Schoenrock GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Oct; 62(4):392-5. PubMed ID: 2685238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
    Cain JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of custom tray material type and fabrication technique on tensile bond strength of impression material adhesive systems.
    Abdullah MA; Talic YF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 12588506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dimensional stability of autopolymerizing acrylic resin impression trays.
    Fehling AW; Hesby RA; Pelleu GB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 3519946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bond strength of two nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials bonded to two thermoplastic resin tray materials.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Dec; 74(6):563-8. PubMed ID: 8778378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Water immersion procedure for making light-cured custom trays with wax spacers.
    Baker PS; Frazier KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Dec; 82(6):714-5. PubMed ID: 10588808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of accuracy of the wash impression technique to rebase and replace the resilient part of a soft-lined denture.
    Burrell CJ; Russell MD; Stewart J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Mar; 65(3):408-13. PubMed ID: 2056460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A complete denture impression technique survey of postdoctoral prosthodontic programs in the United States.
    Mehra M; Vahidi F; Berg RW
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 24118134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the new matrix system with traditional fixed prosthodontic impression procedures.
    Livaditis GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 9513107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Direct pressure provisionalization technique: a new open-tray technique for complete-arch rehabilitations.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Feb; 31(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 11203918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Determining the dimensional stability, fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured acrylic resin custom tray material.
    Khan SB; Geerts G
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2009 Jun; 17(2):67-72. PubMed ID: 19645307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.