These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238379)

  • 1. Analysis of interval measurements on CSE multilead reference ECGs.
    Reddy BR; Xue Q; Zywietz C
    J Electrocardiol; 1996; 29 Suppl():62-6. PubMed ID: 9238379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of noise on computerized electrocardiogram measurements.
    Farrell RM; Rowlandson GI
    J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S165-73. PubMed ID: 16963064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automatic detection of wave boundaries in multilead ECG signals: validation with the CSE database.
    Laguna P; Jané R; Caminal P
    Comput Biomed Res; 1994 Feb; 27(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 8004942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of automated interval measurements by widely used algorithms in digital electrocardiographs.
    Kligfield P; Badilini F; Denjoy I; Babaeizadeh S; Clark E; De Bie J; Devine B; Extramiana F; Generali G; Gregg R; Helfenbein E; Kors J; Leber R; Macfarlane P; Maison-Blanche P; Rowlandson I; Schmid R; Vaglio M; van Herpen G; Xue J; Young B; Green CL
    Am Heart J; 2018 Jun; 200():1-10. PubMed ID: 29898835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Stability of computer ECG amplitude measurements in the presence of noise. The CSE Working Party.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Feb; 23(1):10-31. PubMed ID: 2306932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of automated measurements of electrocardiographic intervals and durations by computer-based algorithms of digital electrocardiographs.
    Kligfield P; Badilini F; Rowlandson I; Xue J; Clark E; Devine B; Macfarlane P; de Bie J; Mortara D; Babaeizadeh S; Gregg R; Helfenbein ED; Green CL
    Am Heart J; 2014 Feb; 167(2):150-159.e1. PubMed ID: 24439975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the performance of electrocardiographic computer programs with the use of a reference data base.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Bourdillon PJ; Brohet C; Dalla Volta S; Andersen JD; Degani R; Denis B; Demeester M
    Circulation; 1985 Mar; 71(3):523-34. PubMed ID: 3838268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A multidifferentiator-based approach to the reliable determination of T-wave offset in electrocardiograms.
    Zhou X; Wei D
    J Electrocardiol; 2011; 44(3):330-9. PubMed ID: 21276591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data compression for storage of resting ECGs digitized at 500 samples/second.
    Reddy BR; Christenson DW; Rowlandson GI; Zywietz C; Sheffield T; Brohet C
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1992; 26(2):133-49. PubMed ID: 1562827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adaptive Noise Reduction Algorithm to Improve R Peak Detection in ECG Measured by Capacitive ECG Sensors.
    Seo M; Choi M; Lee JS; Kim SW
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Jun; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 29966231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Common standards for quantitative electrocardiography: goals and main results. CSE Working Party.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW; Zywietz C
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 2233372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of ECG amplitude measurements in systematic noise tests. Results and recommendations from the CSE project.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():61-7. PubMed ID: 3694103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of reproducibility--automated and digital caliper ECG measurement in the Framingham Heart Study.
    Burke GM; Wang N; Blease S; Levy D; Magnani JW
    J Electrocardiol; 2014; 47(3):288-93. PubMed ID: 24792985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. ANN-based QRS-complex analysis of ECG.
    Vijaya G; Kumar V; Verma HK
    J Med Eng Technol; 1998; 22(4):160-7. PubMed ID: 9680599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A reference data base for multilead electrocardiographic computer measurement programs.
    Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Bourdillon PJ; Degani R; Denis B; Graham I; Harms FM; Macfarlane PW; Mazzocca G
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1987 Dec; 10(6):1313-21. PubMed ID: 3680801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PC-Based ECG waveform recognition-validation of novel software against a reference ECG database.
    Dota CD; Edvardsson N; Skallefell B; Fager G
    Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2009 Jan; 14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S42-7. PubMed ID: 19143742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of PR, QRS, and QT interval measurements by seven ECG interpretation programs.
    De Bie J; Diemberger I; Mason JW
    J Electrocardiol; 2020; 63():75-82. PubMed ID: 33142185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing Wavelet ECG Watermarking to Maintain Measurement Performance According to Industrial Standard.
    Świerkosz A; Augustyniak P
    Sensors (Basel); 2018 Oct; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 30314291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of popular automatic QT interval algorithms assessed by a 'gold standard' and comparison with a Novel method: computer simulation study.
    Hunt AC
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2005 Sep; 5():29. PubMed ID: 16185361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of ECG measurement accuracy on ECG diagnostic statements.
    Zywietz C; Celikag D; Joseph G
    J Electrocardiol; 1996; 29 Suppl():67-72. PubMed ID: 9238380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.