These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238565)

  • 1. Detecting poor design, erroneous analysis and misinterpretation of studies.
    Appleton DR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 9238565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The case for failed meta-analyses.
    Naylor CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evidence-based medicine vs medicine-based evidence.
    Sethi NK; Sethi PK
    Ann Neurol; 2008 Nov; 64(5):592. PubMed ID: 18350575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.
    Walker A; Nixon J
    J Wound Care; 2004 Mar; 13(3):103-6. PubMed ID: 15045804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
    Higgins PA; Straub AJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Statistical analyses: hypotheses or proof?].
    Girard M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Oct; 33(6 Pt 2):3S27-8. PubMed ID: 15643683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studying systematic reviews.
    Del Mar C; Glasziou P
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Nov; 50(11):955-7. PubMed ID: 11711011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Common scientific and statistical errors in obesity research.
    George BJ; Beasley TM; Brown AW; Dawson J; Dimova R; Divers J; Goldsby TU; Heo M; Kaiser KA; Keith SW; Kim MY; Li P; Mehta T; Oakes JM; Skinner A; Stuart E; Allison DB
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2016 Apr; 24(4):781-90. PubMed ID: 27028280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On evidence, embellishment and efficacy.
    Morgan WK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Apr; 3(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9276586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simpler than you think.
    Tidy N
    Nurs Stand; 2000 Apr 19-25; 14(31):61. PubMed ID: 11973959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In search of genetic precision.
    Lancet; 2003 Feb; 361(9355):357. PubMed ID: 12573365
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.
    Baccaglini L; Shuster JJ; Cheng J; Theriaque DW; Schoenbach VJ; Tomar SL; Poole C
    Oral Dis; 2010 Apr; 16(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 19874532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent discussion sections for improving inferential reproducibility in published research.
    Avidan MS; Ioannidis JPA; Mashour GA
    Br J Anaesth; 2019 Apr; 122(4):413-420. PubMed ID: 30857597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIALS: EVOLVING CHANGES ACCORDING TO PERSONALIZED MEDICINE].
    Ernest P; Jandrain B; Scheen AJ
    Rev Med Liege; 2015; 70(5-6):232-6. PubMed ID: 26285444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
    Lopez-Lee D
    Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Quality assessment of therapeutic clinical trials].
    Selbmann HK; Meisner C
    Internist (Berl); 2000 Apr; 41(4):344-8. PubMed ID: 10798182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.