These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238567)

  • 1. The case for failed meta-analyses.
    Naylor CD
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 9238567
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Meta-analyses and systematic errors in publications].
    Bias R
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 2001; 151(1-2):39-40. PubMed ID: 11281127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indiscriminate data aggregations in meta-analysis. A cause for concern among policy makers and social scientists.
    Lopez-Lee D
    Eval Rev; 2002 Oct; 26(5):520-44. PubMed ID: 12243106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can systematic reviews with sparse data be trusted?
    Afshari A; Wetterslev J; Smith AF
    Anaesthesia; 2017 Jan; 72(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 27804113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding the error of our ways: mapping the concepts of validity and reliability.
    Higgins PA; Straub AJ
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 16487776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Meta-Jeopardy": the crisis of representation in qualitative metasynthesis.
    Sandelowski M
    Nurs Outlook; 2006; 54(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 16487774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pooling research results: benefits and limitations of meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP; Lau J
    Jt Comm J Qual Improv; 1999 Sep; 25(9):462-9. PubMed ID: 10481815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-based practice in action: the review process.
    Foster RL
    J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 8(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 12715400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detecting poor design, erroneous analysis and misinterpretation of studies.
    Appleton DR
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1995 Nov; 1(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 9238565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Statistical analyses: hypotheses or proof?].
    Girard M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2004 Oct; 33(6 Pt 2):3S27-8. PubMed ID: 15643683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses "For Dummies".
    Biondi-Zoccai GG; Abbate A; Sheiban I
    EuroIntervention; 2009 Aug; 5(3):289-91. PubMed ID: 19736151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Power dressing and meta-analysis: incorporating power analysis into meta-analysis.
    Muncer S; Taylor S; Craigie M
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 May; 38(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 11972663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based intervention for musculoskeletal disorders.
    Malmivaara A
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1997 Jun; 23(3):161-3. PubMed ID: 9243725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-tailed tests and a statistical significance at 0.05: what do they mean?
    Campbell M
    Midwifery; 2004 Jun; 20(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15177857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reproducibility of results with homeopathic remedies.
    Buckman R
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1128-9. PubMed ID: 10234340
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meta-analyses to evaluate analgesic interventions: a systematic qualitative review of their methodology.
    Jadad AR; McQuay HJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1996 Feb; 49(2):235-43. PubMed ID: 8606325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All evidence is equal, but some evidence is more equal than others: can logic prevail over emotion in the homeopathy debate?
    Bell IR
    J Altern Complement Med; 2005 Oct; 11(5):763-9. PubMed ID: 16296897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On evidence, embellishment and efficacy.
    Morgan WK
    J Eval Clin Pract; 1997 Apr; 3(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 9276586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.