These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238750)

  • 1. A weight bearing method for determining forefoot posting for orthotic fabrication.
    Cummings GS; Higbie EJ
    Physiother Res Int; 1997; 2(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 9238750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of three different posting methods on controlling abnormal subtalar pronation.
    Johanson MA; Donatelli R; Wooden MJ; Andrew PD; Cummings GS
    Phys Ther; 1994 Feb; 74(2):149-58; discussion 158-61. PubMed ID: 8290620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of forefoot and arch posting orthotic designs on first metatarsophalangeal joint kinematics during gait.
    Nawoczenski DA; Ludewig PM
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Jun; 34(6):317-27. PubMed ID: 15233393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Orthotic design and foot impression procedures to control foot alignment.
    Leung AK; Cheng JC; Mak AF
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Dec; 28(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 15658638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot.
    Laughton C; McClay Davis I; Williams DS
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2002 May; 92(5):261-8. PubMed ID: 12015406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Forefoot-rearfoot coupling patterns and tibial internal rotation during stance phase of barefoot versus shod running.
    Eslami M; Begon M; Farahpour N; Allard P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 17049700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Radiographic changes in forefoot geometry with weightbearing.
    Fuhrmann RA; Layher F; Wetzel WD
    Foot Ankle Int; 2003 Apr; 24(4):326-31. PubMed ID: 12735375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The clinical measure of forefoot-shank alignment partially reflects mechanical properties of the midfoot joint complex.
    Paes BDDC; Resende RA; Gomes RB; Gontijo BA; Magalhães FA; Ocarino JM; Fonseca ST; Souza TR
    Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2019 Jul; 42():98-103. PubMed ID: 31102822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of subtalar joint position on dorsiflexion of the ankle/rearfoot versus midfoot/forefoot during gastrocnemius stretching.
    Johanson MA; DeArment A; Hines K; Riley E; Martin M; Thomas J; Geist K
    Foot Ankle Int; 2014 Jan; 35(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 24259750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Forefoot varus predicts subtalar hyperpronation in young people.
    Silva RS; Ferreira AL; Veronese LM; Serrão FV
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2014 Nov; 104(6):594-600. PubMed ID: 25514271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of plantar pressure in forefoot relief shoes of different designs.
    Carl HD; Pfander D; Swoboda B
    Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Feb; 27(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 16487464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study.
    Sell KE; Verity TM; Worrell TW; Pease BJ; Wigglesworth J
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 1994 Mar; 19(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 8156068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is it important to position foot in subtalar joint neutral position during non-weight-bearing molding for foot orthoses?
    Lee WC; Lee CK; Leung AK; Hutchins SW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2012; 49(3):459-66. PubMed ID: 22773204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-segment foot kinematics and ground reaction forces during gait of individuals with plantar fasciitis.
    Chang R; Rodrigues PA; Van Emmerik RE; Hamill J
    J Biomech; 2014 Aug; 47(11):2571-7. PubMed ID: 24992816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of rearfoot-controlling orthotic treatment on dorsiflexion of the hallux in feet with abnormal subtalar pronation: a preliminary report.
    Munuera PV; Domínguez G; Palomo IC; Lafuente G
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2006; 96(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 16868319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of rocker sole and SACH heel on kinematics in gait.
    Wu WL; Rosenbaum D; Su FC
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):639-46. PubMed ID: 15471691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forefoot angle determines duration and amplitude of pronation during walking.
    Monaghan GM; Lewis CL; Hsu WH; Saltzman E; Hamill J; Holt KG
    Gait Posture; 2013 May; 38(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23117096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contact force ratio: a new parameter to assess foot arch function.
    Leung AK; Cheng JC; Zhang M; Fan Y; Dong X
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2004 Aug; 28(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 15382810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hardness and posting of foot orthoses modify plantar contact area, plantar pressure, and perceived comfort when cycling.
    Bousie JA; Blanch P; McPoil TG; Vicenzino B
    J Sci Med Sport; 2018 Jul; 21(7):691-696. PubMed ID: 29191729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of heel height on forefoot loading.
    Corrigan JP; Moore DP; Stephens MM
    Foot Ankle; 1993; 14(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 8491429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.