416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238881)
1. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes.
Volpenhein DW; Walsh ME; Dellerman PA; Burkett TA
J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8031486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.
Battista GW; Petrone DM
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D5-7. PubMed ID: 8397838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative evaluation of the percent acceptable end-rounded bristles: Butler G.U.M., Colgate Plus, Crest Complete, and Reach.
Dellerman PA; Burkett TA; Kreyling KM
J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 7999288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
Battista GW; Petrone DM
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush compared to two control manual toothbrushes in single use studies.
Heins P; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Biesbrock AR
Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():28A-32A. PubMed ID: 12512989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy of two compact manual toothbrushes.
Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):111-3. PubMed ID: 8031478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design.
Beals D; Ngo T; Feng Y; Cook D; Grau DG; Weber DA
Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):5A-14A. PubMed ID: 11763943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative laboratory evaluation of three toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(Suppl C):C5-8. PubMed ID: 1306675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
Ojima M; Shizukuishi S; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Hanioka T
J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of bi-level and flat bristled toothbrushes.
Yankell SL; Emling RC
J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):128-30. PubMed ID: 8031482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
