These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

309 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238886)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new method for in vitro evaluation of the interproximal penetration of manual toothbrushes.
    Volpenhein DW; Walsh ME; Dellerman PA; Burkett TA
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8031486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laboratory interproximal access efficacy comparison of a rippled bristles toothbrush and a flat manual toothbrush.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):82-4. PubMed ID: 8003238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the percent acceptable end-rounded bristles: Butler G.U.M., Colgate Plus, Crest Complete, and Reach.
    Dellerman PA; Burkett TA; Kreyling KM
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 7999288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Laboratory evaluations of interproximal access of two differently bristled manual toothbrushes.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):85-7. PubMed ID: 8003239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficacy of three toothbrushes on established gingivitis and plaque.
    Sowinski J; Petrone DM; Wachs GN; Chaknis P; Kemp J; Sprosta AA; Devizio W
    Am J Dent; 2008 Dec; 21(6):339-45. PubMed ID: 19146124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and laboratory evaluation of a new toothbrush with a novel brush head design.
    Beals D; Ngo T; Feng Y; Cook D; Grau DG; Weber DA
    Am J Dent; 2000 Mar; 13(Spec No):5A-14A. PubMed ID: 11763943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Plaque removal efficacy of a battery-operated power toothbrush compared to two control manual toothbrushes in single use studies.
    Heins P; Bartizek RD; Walters PA; Biesbrock AR
    Am J Dent; 2002 Sep; 15 Spec No():28A-32A. PubMed ID: 12512989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the laboratory interproximal access efficacy of the Colgate precision toothbrush and the Crest complete toothbrush.
    Battista GW; Petrone DM
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D5-7. PubMed ID: 8397838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluations of toothbrush interproximal penetration ratios.
    Yost KG; Miluszewski KF; Chen AC
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 4(4):125-7. PubMed ID: 8031481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative efficacy of two battery-powered toothbrushes on dental plaque removal.
    Ruhlman CD; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(3):95-9. PubMed ID: 11887517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative efficacy of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a commercially available manual toothbrush on the removal of established supragingival plaque: a single-use crossover study in adults.
    Singh S; Rustogi KN; Chaknis P; Petrone ME; DeVizio W; Proskin HM
    J Clin Dent; 2005; 16(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 16170978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Oral-B CrossAction manual toothbrush: a 5-year literature review.
    Cugini M; Warren PR
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2006 May; 72(4):323. PubMed ID: 16684475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative clinical study in plaque removal efficacy of a new sonic toothbrush (Float-Brush) with floating bristle action.
    Ojima M; Shizukuishi S; Matsuo T; Kanesaki N; Hanioka T
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):42-4. PubMed ID: 12723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Plaque removal efficacy of a novel manual toothbrush with MicroPulse bristles and an advanced split-head design.
    Warren P; Thompson M; Cugini M
    J Clin Dent; 2007; 18(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 17508624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative laboratory evaluation of two new toothbrushes regarding interproximal access efficacy.
    Yankell SL; Shi X; Emling RC
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4 Suppl D():D1-4. PubMed ID: 8397835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlations between two plaque indices in assessment of toothbrush effectiveness.
    Cugini M; Thompson M; Warren PR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 Nov; 7(5):1-9. PubMed ID: 17091134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interproximal access efficacy of three manual toothbrushes with extended, x-angled or flat multitufted bristles.
    Stiller S; Bosma ML; Shi X; Spirgel CM; Yankell SL
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2010 Aug; 8(3):244-8. PubMed ID: 20624196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.