BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9238892)

  • 1. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: relative degree of bristle end-rounding.
    McLey L; Boyd RL; Sarker S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):86-90. PubMed ID: 9238892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: laboratory determination of relative abrasion of three powered toothbrushes.
    McLey L; Boyd RL; Sarker S
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):76-80. PubMed ID: 9238890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: in vivo determination of average force for use of manual and powered toothbrushes.
    Boyd RL; McLey L; Zahradnik R
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):72-5. PubMed ID: 9238889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and laboratory evaluation of powered electric toothbrushes: laboratory determination of relative interproximal cleaning efficiency of four powered toothbrushes.
    Sarker S; McLey L; Boyd RL
    J Clin Dent; 1997; 8(3 Spec No):81-5. PubMed ID: 9238891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparative evaluation of the percent acceptable end-rounded bristles: Butler G.U.M., Colgate Plus, Crest Complete, and Reach.
    Dellerman PA; Burkett TA; Kreyling KM
    J Clin Dent; 1994; 5(2):38-45. PubMed ID: 7999288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the end-rounding of nylon bristles in commercial toothbrushes: Crest Complete and Oral-B.
    Mulry CA; Dellerman PA; Ludwa RJ; White DJ; Wild JE
    J Clin Dent; 1992; 3(2):47-50. PubMed ID: 1524685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest complete toothbrush versus the Current Crest complete toothbrush, the Colgate Precision toothbrush and the Oral-B P40 toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Handel SE; Hughes TJ; Wild J
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9238881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative cleaning effectiveness of manual and powered toothbrushes.
    Hunt SA
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):211-4. PubMed ID: 12518492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An electron microscopic comparison of bristle end-rounding of three commercial toothbrushes.
    Rawls HR; Smith NK; Lentz DL; Cobb GW; Bailey MS
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 8003240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bristle end-rounding in children's toothbrushes: a comparative study.
    Rawls HR; van Gelder R; Smith NK; Jeppesen M; Yuan C
    J Clin Dent; 1993; 4(2):61-6. PubMed ID: 8267874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bristle end rounding of manual toothbrushes and reproducibility of end rounding classification.
    Jung M; Koçkapan C; Wetzel WE
    Am J Dent; 2003 Oct; 16(5):299-304. PubMed ID: 14677607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quality of bristle end-rounding on replaceable heads of powered toothbrushes.
    Jung M; Soydan N; Rubbert F; Wetzel WE
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 32(6):604-9. PubMed ID: 15882218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A review of current toothbrush bristle endo-rounding studies.
    Drisko C; Henderson R; Yancy J
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1995 Jul; 16(7):694, 696, 698; quiz 708. PubMed ID: 8595590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative extrinsic stain removal effectiveness of a new battery-powered toothbrush and a flat trim manual toothbrush.
    Hunt SA; Bartizek RD
    Am J Dent; 2004 Jan; 17 Spec No():13A-17A. PubMed ID: 14998049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparative evaluation of the in vitro penetration performance of the improved Crest Complete toothbrush versus the Colgate Total toothbrush and the Oral-B Advantage toothbrush.
    Volpenhein DW; Hartman WL
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):101-5. PubMed ID: 9238886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relative effectiveness of six powered toothbrushes for dental plaque removal.
    Biesbrock AR; Walters PA; Bartizek RD
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):198-202. PubMed ID: 12518489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of a clamp on toothbrush bristle deterioration.
    Schneider P; Musselman R; Sarkar NK
    J Clin Dent; 1995; 6(4):198-201. PubMed ID: 8624232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plaque removal efficacy of a new experimental battery-powered toothbrush relative to two advanced-design manual toothbrushes.
    Haun J; Williams K; Friesen L; Ferrante A; Walters PA; Bartizek RD; Biesbrock AR
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(5):191-7. PubMed ID: 12518488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An investigation into the effect of three months' clinical wear on toothbrush efficacy: results from two independent studies.
    Conforti NJ; Cordero RE; Liebman J; Bowman JP; Putt MS; Kuebler DS; Davidson KR; Cugini M; Warren PR
    J Clin Dent; 2003; 14(2):29-33. PubMed ID: 12723100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined effect of end-rounded versus tapered bristles and a dentifrice on plaque removal and gingival abrasion.
    Caporossi LS; Dutra DA; Martins MR; Prochnow EP; Moreira CH; Kantorski KZ
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 26981758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.