242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9239616)
1. Dichotomous thinking in nuclear medicine technology.
Dowd SB; Bolus NE
J Nucl Med Technol; 1997 Jun; 25(2):120-3. PubMed ID: 9239616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient education in nuclear medicine technology practice.
Steves AM; Dowd SB
J Nucl Med Technol; 1999 Mar; 27(1):4-13; quiz 17. PubMed ID: 10322568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Teaching critical-thinking skills through group-based learning.
Kowalczyk N; Leggett TD
Radiol Technol; 2005; 77(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 16218019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using personality type to improve clinical education effectiveness.
Winn JM; Grantham VV
J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Dec; 33(4):210-3. PubMed ID: 16322120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhancing laboratory activities in nuclear medicine education.
Grantham V; Martin C; Schmitz C
J Nucl Med Technol; 2009 Dec; 37(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19914977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Collaborative learning in radiologic science education.
Yates JL
Radiol Technol; 2006; 78(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 16998192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Distance assisted training in sub-Saharan Africa: a program evaluation.
Philotheou GM
J Nucl Med Technol; 2004 Sep; 32(3):166-70. PubMed ID: 15347696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Teaching critical thinking skills.
Bugg N
Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):433-4. PubMed ID: 9170190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Thinking in nursing education. Part I. A student's experience learning to think.
Ironside PM
Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(5):238-42. PubMed ID: 10754845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concept mapping: an effective, active teaching-learning method.
Clayton LH
Nurs Educ Perspect; 2006; 27(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 16921805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are technologists qualified to be educators? Point: technologists are not qualified to be educators.
Morgan MM
J Nucl Med Technol; 2001 Sep; 29(3):159-61. PubMed ID: 11564842
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interactive questioning: why ask why?
Tanenbaum BG; Tilson ER; Cross DS; Rodgers AT
Radiol Technol; 1997; 68(5):435-8. PubMed ID: 9170191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Are technologists qualified to be educators? Counterpoint: technologists are qualified to be educators.
Coulston CH
J Nucl Med Technol; 2001 Sep; 29(3):161-2. PubMed ID: 11583013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving the clinical instruction of student technologists.
Steves AM
J Nucl Med Technol; 2005 Dec; 33(4):205-9. PubMed ID: 16322119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Thinking in nursing education. Part II. A teacher's experience.
Ironside PM
Nurs Health Care Perspect; 1999; 20(5):243-7. PubMed ID: 10754846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Problem solving revisited.
Hauser MJ; Feinberg D
J Psychiatr Nurs Ment Health Serv; 1977 Oct; 15(10):13-7. PubMed ID: 200743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Collaborative learning in radiography education.
Dowd SB
Radiol Technol; 1994; 65(5):299-303. PubMed ID: 8058912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Creative thinking-clinical problem solving resident physician training program at Kameda Medical Center.
Stein GH
Jpn Hosp; 1995 Jul; 14():35-7. PubMed ID: 10151318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Using case studies to teach radiography.
Dowd SB; Wilson BG
Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 8570846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective affective learning.
Castle A
Radiography; 1984; 50(590):81-4. PubMed ID: 6709861
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
