These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9239958)

  • 1. Evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes by the PAR Index.
    Birkeland K; Furevik J; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Jun; 19(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 9239958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long-term benefits of orthodontic treatment.
    Linklater RA; Fox NA
    Br Dent J; 2002 May; 192(10):583-7. PubMed ID: 12075958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors associated with long-term patient satisfaction.
    Maia NG; Normando D; Maia FA; Ferreira MA; do Socorro Costa Feitosa Alves M
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Nov; 80(6):1155-8. PubMed ID: 20677969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of treatment and posttreatment changes of protraction facemask treatment using the PAR index.
    Ngan P; Yiu C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Oct; 118(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 11029737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term evaluation of treated class II division 1 malocclusions utilizing the PAR index.
    Otuyemi OD; Jones SP
    Br J Orthod; 1995 May; 22(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 7640256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with orthodontic stability: a retrospective study of 209 patients.
    Maia NG; Normando AD; Maia FA; Ferreira MA; Alves MS
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 20209179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between occlusion and satisfaction with dental appearance in orthodontically treated and untreated groups. A longitudinal study.
    Birkeland K; Bøe OE; Wisth PJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Oct; 22(5):509-18. PubMed ID: 11105407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finishing occlusion, degree of stability and the PAR index.
    Woods M; Lee D; Crawford E
    Aust Orthod J; 2000 Mar; 16(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 11201961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system.
    Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 1999 Apr; 21(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 10327742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Personal audit in orthodontics.
    Richmond S
    Br J Orthod; 1993 May; 20(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 8518268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malocclusion severity in Asian men in relation to malocclusion type and orthodontic treatment need.
    Soh J; Sandham A; Chan YH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):648-52. PubMed ID: 16286213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome in relation to retention status: An 8-year follow-up.
    Steinnes J; Johnsen G; Kerosuo H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Jun; 151(6):1027-1033. PubMed ID: 28554448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of early treatment outcomes rendered in three different types of malocclusions.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Kang HK; Dhawan A; Al-Qawasmi R; Pacheco RR
    Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):253-258. PubMed ID: 29513021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances in the General Dental Service in Scotland.
    Teh LH; Kerr WJ; McColl JH
    J Orthod; 2000 Jun; 27(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 10867074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Treatment results in dental school orthodontic patients in 1983 and 1993.
    Firestone AR; Häsler RU; Ingervall B
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Feb; 69(1):19-26. PubMed ID: 10022180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retrospective analysis of long-term stable and unstable orthodontic treatment outcomes.
    Ormiston JP; Huang GJ; Little RM; Decker JD; Seuk GD
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):568-74; quiz 669. PubMed ID: 16286203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of the quality of the finished occlusion on postretention occlusal relapse.
    de Freitas KM; Janson G; de Freitas MR; Pinzan A; Henriques JF; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e9-14. PubMed ID: 17920494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Efficacy of orthodontic treatment according to the Peer Assessment Rating index].
    Piskorski D
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():335-51. PubMed ID: 15552857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Efficiency and Duration of Orthodontic/Orthognathic Surgery Treatment.
    Dehghani M; Fazeli F; Sattarzadeh AP
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):1997-2000. PubMed ID: 28968333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of peer assessment ratings (PAR) from 1-phase and 2-phase treatment protocols for Class II malocclusions.
    King GJ; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C; Taylor M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 May; 123(5):489-96. PubMed ID: 12750665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.