338 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9240653)
1. Dosimetric comparison of treatment planning systems in irradiation of breast with tangential fields.
Cheng CW; Das IJ; Tang W; Chang S; Tsai JS; Ceberg C; De Gaspie B; Singh R; Fein DA; Fowble B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):835-42. PubMed ID: 9240653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of the number of computed tomographic slices on dose distributions and evaluation of treatment planning systems for radiation therapy of intact breast.
Cheng CW; Das IJ; Stea B
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Aug; 30(1):183-95. PubMed ID: 8083113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric analysis of intact breast irradiation in off-axis planes.
Buchholz TA; Gurgoze E; Bice WS; Prestidge BR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Aug; 39(1):261-7. PubMed ID: 9300762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized treatment planning in radiation therapy of intact breast: influence of number of CT-cuts.
Shouman T; El-Taher Z; Radwan A
J Egypt Natl Canc Inst; 2005 Jun; 17(2):76-84. PubMed ID: 16508678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the homogeneity of breast dose distributions with and without the medial wedge.
Ikner CL; Russo R; Podgorsak MB; Proulx GM; Lee RJ
Med Dosim; 1998; 23(2):89-94. PubMed ID: 9664273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Commissioning of a micro multi-leaf collimator and planning system for stereotactic radiosurgery.
Cosgrove VP; Jahn U; Pfaender M; Bauer S; Budach V; Wurm RE
Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):325-36. PubMed ID: 10392819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comprehensive clinical 3-dimensional dosimetric analysis of forward planned IMRT and conventional wedge planned techniques for intact breast radiotherapy.
Herrick JS; Neill CJ; Rosser PF
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 18262125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spatial variation of dosimetric leaf gap and its impact on dose delivery.
Kumaraswamy LK; Schmitt JD; Bailey DW; Xu ZZ; Podgorsak MB
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111711. PubMed ID: 25370625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric verification of open asymmetric photon fields calculated with a treatment planning system based on dose-to-energy-fluence concepts.
Hurkmans C; Knöös T; Nilsson P
Phys Med Biol; 1996 Aug; 41(8):1277-90. PubMed ID: 8858720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An Assessment of Dosimetric Characteristics of Inline 2.5 Mega Voltage Unflattened Imaging X-Ray Beam.
Rajamanickam T; Muthu S; Murugan P; Dinesan C; Mekala C; Senthilnathan K; Arunai Nambi Raj N; Ramesh Babu P
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Aug; 20(8):2531-2539. PubMed ID: 31450929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment plan evaluation using dose-volume histogram (DVH) and spatial dose-volume histogram (zDVH).
Cheng CW; Das IJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1999 Mar; 43(5):1143-50. PubMed ID: 10192366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of optimal radiation energy for different breast sizes using CT-simulator [correction of simulatior] in tangential breast irradiation.
Nihei K; Mitsumori M; Ishigaki T; Fujishiro S; Kokubo M; Nagata Y; Sasai K; Hiraoka M
Breast Cancer; 2000; 7(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 11029803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dose distribution at the Bragg peak: Dose measurements using EBT and RTQA gafchromic film set at two positions to the central beam axis.
Borowicz DM; Malicki J; Mytsin G; Shipulin K
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1538-1544. PubMed ID: 28196271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculation of dose in off-central axis planes using off-axis ratios.
Prasad SC; Bassano DA; Ames TE
Med Phys; 1984; 11(2):204-6. PubMed ID: 6727796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators.
Ashokkumar S; Ganesh KM; Ramalingam K; Karthikeyan K; Jagadheeskumar N
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3439-3444. PubMed ID: 29286616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
