These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9240811)
1. Let the user beware: specificity and sensitivity limits for in vitro diagnostic devices. Levine D; Klenk R; Morelli A; Hofreuter N; Hoffmeister H Pediatrics; 1997 Aug; 100(2 Pt 1):267-9. PubMed ID: 9240811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Infectious mononucleosis test performance on CAP survey specimens. Rippey JH; Bowman HE Am J Clin Pathol; 1979 Aug; 72(2 Suppl):363-4. PubMed ID: 224693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kits for the diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis compared with the Paul-Bunnell test. Uldall A; Jensen BS; Henrichsen J J Clin Chem Clin Biochem; 1990 Jun; 28(6):423-5. PubMed ID: 2212959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FDA's new regulatory paradigms for in vitro diagnostic devices. Robinowitz M; Gutman SI Cytotherapy; 1999; 1(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 20426566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Are current regulations for approval of in vitro diagnostic devices adequate? Levine D; Grossberg R; Tilton R; Banks P; Rosenfeld A JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(2):187-9. PubMed ID: 9669797 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US manufacturing guideline for IVD products. Donawa M Med Device Technol; 2000 Oct; 11(8):23-4. PubMed ID: 11185183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do it yourself? Those easy-to-use home medical tests can be anything but. Some are downright misleading. Smith IK Time; 2001 Mar; 157(10):95. PubMed ID: 11256013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Studies on administration of in-vitro diagnostic reagents]. Wang Z; Qian H; Xu FL; Huang JH; Gu WK Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2005 Mar; 29(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 16011119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic confusion created by positive monospot tests. Kaplan JE; Gillespie R Colo Med; 1980 Mar; 77(3):111-2. PubMed ID: 7363572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Update on FDA regulation of in vitro diagnostic devices. Gutman S; Richter K; Alpert S JAMA; 1998 Jul; 280(2):190-2. PubMed ID: 9669798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Food and Drug Administration approval for 2 new molecular infectious disease assays. Press RD Mol Diagn; 1999 Sep; 4(3):256. PubMed ID: 10644172 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid testing for HIV: why so fast? Kane B Ann Intern Med; 1999 Sep; 131(6):481-3. PubMed ID: 10498576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Plans for HIV kits on hold after false-positive results. Nurs Stand; 2006 Feb 1-7; 20(21):18. PubMed ID: 16482876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Home testing for HIV. Wright AA; Katz IT N Engl J Med; 2006 Feb; 354(5):437-40. PubMed ID: 16452553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Proposed HIV home testing kit draws applause and brickbats. AIDS Policy Law; 1994 Dec; 9(23):4. PubMed ID: 12166382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons from primary HIV infection. Hecht F; Pilcher C Focus; 2007 Feb; 22(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 17549830 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Home HIV tests: the need for regulation. Tamborlane TA; Kunz DA Caring; 1996 Aug; 15(8):52-5. PubMed ID: 10159955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HIV home tests can be inaccurate. J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1999 Jul; 99(7):355. PubMed ID: 10441932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]