BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9241299)

  • 1. Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized multicenter trial.
    Papatsonis DN; Van Geijn HP; Adèr HJ; Lange FM; Bleker OP; Dekker GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 90(2):230-4. PubMed ID: 9241299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor. Comparison of their efficacy and secondary effects.
    Cararach V; Palacio M; Martínez S; Deulofeu P; Sánchez M; Cobo T; Coll O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 Aug; 127(2):204-8. PubMed ID: 16310305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tocolytic effectiveness of nifedipine versus ritodrine and follow-up of newborns: a randomised controlled trial.
    Van De Water M; Kessel ET; De Kleine MJ; Oei SG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 18307075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnesium sulfate compared with nifedipine for acute tocolysis of preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lyell DJ; Pullen K; Campbell L; Ching S; Druzin ML; Chitkara U; Burrs D; Caughey AB; El-Sayed YY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 17601897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ritodrine and nifedipine as tocolytic agents: a preliminary comparison.
    van Dijk KG; Dekker GA; van Geijn HP
    J Perinat Med; 1995; 23(5):409-15. PubMed ID: 8606348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor; a meta-analysis.
    Oei SG; Mol BW; de Kleine MJ; Brölmann HA
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1999 Oct; 78(9):783-8. PubMed ID: 10535341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Management of recurrent preterm labor in twin gestations with nifedipine tocolysis.
    de la Torre L; Istwan NB; Desch C; Rhea DJ; Roca L; Stanziano GJ; González-Quintero VH
    Am J Perinatol; 2008 Oct; 25(9):555-60. PubMed ID: 18773381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nifedipine versus ritodrine for suppressing preterm labor.
    Meyer WR; Randall HW; Graves WL
    J Reprod Med; 1990 Jun; 35(6):649-53. PubMed ID: 2359062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of nifedipine and ritodrine for the treatment of preterm labor.
    Bracero LA; Leikin E; Kirshenbaum N; Tejani N
    Am J Perinatol; 1991 Nov; 8(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 1814297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficacy of oral nifedipine versus terbutaline injection in preterm labor.
    Laohapojanart N; Soorapan S; Wacharaprechanont T; Ratanajamit C
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Nov; 90(11):2461-9. PubMed ID: 18181335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multicentre, parallel group, randomised, single-blind study of the safety and efficacy of atosiban versus ritodrine in the treatment of acute preterm labour in Korean women.
    Shim JY; Park YW; Yoon BH; Cho YK; Yang JH; Lee Y; Kim A
    BJOG; 2006 Nov; 113(11):1228-34. PubMed ID: 16978233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oral nifedipine maintenance therapy after acute intravenous tocolysis in preterm labor.
    Sayin NC; Varol FG; Balkanli-Kaplan P; Sayin M
    J Perinat Med; 2004; 32(3):220-4. PubMed ID: 15188794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A randomized comparison of nifedipine and ritodrine for suppression of preterm labor.
    Koks CA; Brölmann HA; de Kleine MJ; Manger PA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Apr; 77(2):171-6. PubMed ID: 9578274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of tocolysis with nifedipine or ritodrine: analysis of efficacy and maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcome.
    Ferguson JE; Dyson DC; Schutz T; Stevenson DK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 163(1 Pt 1):105-11. PubMed ID: 2197860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomized trial of nifedipine vs. ritodrine in threatened preterm labor.
    García-Velasco JA; González González A
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jun; 61(3):239-44. PubMed ID: 9688484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pregnancy and economic outcomes in patients treated for recurrent preterm labor.
    Fleming A; Bonebrake R; Istwan N; Rhea D; Coleman S; Stanziano G
    J Perinatol; 2004 Apr; 24(4):223-7. PubMed ID: 14999214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use of atosiban and ritodrine in external cephalic version.
    Stergiotou I; Talbot F; Yoong W
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(8):927-9. PubMed ID: 17653876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two dose regimens of nifedipine for management of preterm labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    Nassar AH; Abu-Musa AA; Awwad J; Khalil A; Tabbara J; Usta IM
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Sep; 26(8):575-81. PubMed ID: 19399705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [A randomized study of the treatment of threatened premature labor. Nifedipine versus ritodrine].
    Janky E; Leng JJ; Cormier PH; Salamon R; Meynard J
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1990; 19(4):478-82. PubMed ID: 2380510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of indomethacin versus ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized study.
    Morales WJ; Smith SG; Angel JL; O'Brien WF; Knuppel RA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Oct; 74(4):567-72. PubMed ID: 2677863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.