229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9242092)
1. A clinical/statistical comparison between the subpedicle connective tissue graft method and the guided tissue regeneration technique in root coverage.
Ricci G; Silvestri M; Tinti C; Rasperini G
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1996 Dec; 16(6):538-45. PubMed ID: 9242092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mucogingival versus guided tissue regeneration procedures in the treatment of deep recession type defects.
Zucchelli G; Clauser C; De Sanctis M; Calandriello M
J Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 69(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 9526912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Root coverage with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and modified tunnel technique. An evaluation of long-term results.
Tözüm TF
N Y State Dent J; 2006; 72(4):38-41. PubMed ID: 16925012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.
Ito K; Oshio K; Shiomi N; Murai S
Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):319-26. PubMed ID: 11203942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane.
Müller HP; Stahl M; Eger T
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2001 Apr; 21(2):171-81. PubMed ID: 11829391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Root coverage stability of the subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration: a 30-month follow-up clinical trial.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio E; Zuza EP; Marcantonio RA
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):114-20. PubMed ID: 22652007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subpedicle connective tissue graft versus guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane in the treatment of human gingival recession defects.
Trombelli L; Scabbia A; Tatakis DN; Calura G
J Periodontol; 1998 Nov; 69(11):1271-7. PubMed ID: 9848537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession.
Borghetti A; Glise JM; Monnet-Corti V; Dejou J
J Periodontol; 1999 Feb; 70(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10102549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The subepithelial connective tissue graft: part II. Histologic healing and clinical root coverage.
Sedon CL; Breault LG; Covington LL; Bishop BG
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 May; 6(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 15915213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 2 clinical techniques for treatment of gingival recession.
Wang HL; Bunyaratavej P; Labadie M; Shyr Y; MacNeil RL
J Periodontol; 2001 Oct; 72(10):1301-11. PubMed ID: 11699470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession.
Rahmani ME; Lades MA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2006 May; 7(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 16685296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of two root-coverage techniques with regard to interdental papilla dimension as a prognostic factor.
Haghighati F; Mousavi M; Moslemi N; Kebria MM; Golestan B
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Apr; 29(2):179-89. PubMed ID: 19408480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The association of a polydioxanone tent without a guided tissue regeneration membrane to a coronal sliding flap for root coverage.
de Toledo Lourenço AH; de Toledo Lourenço E; Fraga MR; Vitral RW
J Periodontol; 2009 Oct; 80(10):1674-9. PubMed ID: 19792858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enamel matrix proteins (Emdogain) in combination with coronally advanced flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of shallow gingival recessions.
Berlucchi I; Francetti L; Del Fabbro M; Testori T; Weinstein RL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Dec; 22(6):583-93. PubMed ID: 12516830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ten-year results after connective tissue grafts and guided tissue regeneration for root coverage.
Nickles K; Ratka-Krüger P; Neukranz E; Raetzke P; Eickholz P
J Periodontol; 2010 Jun; 81(6):827-36. PubMed ID: 20450359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
