BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9242744)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance characteristics of architectural features revealed by high spatial-resolution MR imaging of the breast.
    Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Siegelman ES; Langlotz CP; Orel SG; Sullivan D; Muenz LA; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Aug; 169(2):409-15. PubMed ID: 9242744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model.
    Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Orel SG; Hochman MG; Langlotz CP; Reynolds CA; Torosian MH
    Radiology; 1997 Mar; 202(3):833-41. PubMed ID: 9051042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. MR imaging of peritoneal disease: comparison of contrast-enhanced fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled and spin-echo imaging.
    Low RN; Sigeti JS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Nov; 163(5):1131-40. PubMed ID: 7976889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter study.
    Schnall MD; Blume J; Bluemke DA; DeAngelis GA; DeBruhl N; Harms S; Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hylton N; Kuhl CK; Pisano ED; Causer P; Schnitt SJ; Thickman D; Stelling CB; Weatherall PT; Lehman C; Gatsonis CA
    Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 16373758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled imaging of the liver: pulse sequence optimization and comparison with spin-echo MR imaging.
    Low RN; Francis IR; Herfkens RJ; Jeffrey RB; Glazer GM; Foo TK; Shimakawa A; Pelc NJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Mar; 160(3):501-9. PubMed ID: 8381572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Orel SG; Schnall MD; LiVolsi VA; Troupin RH
    Radiology; 1994 Feb; 190(2):485-93. PubMed ID: 8284404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis.
    Buadu LD; Murakami J; Murayama S; Hashiguchi N; Sakai S; Masuda K; Toyoshima S; Kuroki S; Ohno S
    Radiology; 1996 Sep; 200(3):639-49. PubMed ID: 8756909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The MRT of the breast with 2D-spin-echo and gradient-echo sequences in diagnostically problematic cases].
    Allgayer B; Lukas P; Loos W; Kersting-Sommerhoff B
    Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):423-7. PubMed ID: 8490150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic bilateral contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: trade-off between spatial and temporal resolution.
    Kuhl CK; Schild HH; Morakkabati N
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):789-800. PubMed ID: 16118161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced mass on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: Lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Okafuji T; Kamitani T; Soeda H; Setoguchi T; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Sadanaga N; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1157-65. PubMed ID: 18972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Update of breast MR imaging architectural interpretation model.
    Nunes LW; Schnall MD; Orel SG
    Radiology; 2001 May; 219(2):484-94. PubMed ID: 11323476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Malignant spiculated breast masses: dynamic contrast enhanced MR (DCE-MR) imaging enhancement characteristics and histopathological correlation.
    Gokalp G; Topal U; Yildirim N; Tolunay S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 21236612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images.
    Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images.
    Yabuuchi H; Matsuo Y; Kamitani T; Setoguchi T; Okafuji T; Soeda H; Sakai S; Hatakenaka M; Kubo M; Tokunaga E; Yamamoto H; Honda H
    Eur J Radiol; 2010 Jul; 75(1):e126-32. PubMed ID: 19796900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of staging rectal tumors with contrast-enhanced transrectal MR imaging.
    Vogl TJ; Pegios W; Mack MG; Hünerbein M; Hintze R; Adler A; Lobbeck H; Hammerstingl R; Wust P; Schlag P; Felix R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Jun; 168(6):1427-34. PubMed ID: 9168702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Renal lymphoma: demonstration by MR imaging.
    Semelka RC; Kelekis NL; Burdeny DA; Mitchell DG; Brown JJ; Siegelman ES
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):823-7. PubMed ID: 8610558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pelvic lesions in patients with treated cervical carcinoma: efficacy of pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR images in distinguishing recurrent tumors from benign conditions.
    Hawighorst H; Knapstein PG; Schaeffer U; Knopp MV; Brix G; Hoffmann U; Zuna I; Essig M; van Kaick G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Feb; 166(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 8553955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique.
    Boetes C; Barentsz JO; Mus RD; van der Sluis RF; van Erning LJ; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Ruys SH
    Radiology; 1994 Dec; 193(3):777-81. PubMed ID: 7972823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Peripheral washout sign on contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast.
    Sherif H; Mahfouz AE; Oellinger H; Hadijuana J; Blohmer JU; Taupitz M; Felix R; Hamm B
    Radiology; 1997 Oct; 205(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 9314987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic high-spatial-resolution MR imaging of suspicious breast lesions: diagnostic criteria and interobserver variability.
    Kinkel K; Helbich TH; Esserman LJ; Barclay J; Schwerin EH; Sickles EA; Hylton NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Jul; 175(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 10882243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.