These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of voiding cystourethrography in neonates, infants, and children. Kronemer KA; Don S; Luker GD; Hildebolt C AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):791-3. PubMed ID: 10063884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computed radiography in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units: a comparison of 2.5 K x 2 K soft-copy images vs digital hard-copy film. Brill PW; Winchester P; Cahill P; Lesser M; Durfee SM; Giess CS; Auld PA; Greenwald B Pediatr Radiol; 1996; 26(5):333-6. PubMed ID: 8657462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of soft-copy versus hard-copy interpretation of emergency department radiographs: a prototype study. Kundel HL; Polansky M; Dalinka MK; Choplin RH; Gefter WB; Kneelend JB; Miller WT; Miller WT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 11517041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metastases of colorectal carcinoma: comparison of soft- and hard-copy helical CT interpretation. Pijl ME; Wasser MN; Joekes EC; van de Velde CJ; Bloem JL Radiology; 2003 Jun; 227(3):747-51. PubMed ID: 12702822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnosis of intraventricular hemorrhage in the newborn: value of sonography via the posterior fontanelle. Anderson N; Allan R; Darlow B; Malpas T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Oct; 163(4):893-6. PubMed ID: 8092030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems. Kim AY; Cho KS; Song KS; Kim JH; Kim JG; Ha HK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images. Razavi M; Sayre JW; Taira RK; Simons M; Huang HK; Chuang KS; Rahbar G; Kangarloo H AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography. Ueda K; Iwasaki S; Nagasawa M; Sueyoshi S; Takahama J; Ide K; Kichikawa K Radiat Med; 2003; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Hard-copy (film) versus soft-copy (CRT) reading performance between compressed and uncompressed images: SOLs in abdominal CT images]. Ando Y; Tsukamoto N; Kawaguchi O; Kitamura M; Kunieda E; Kubo A; Ogasawara K; Kinosada Y; Maeda T; Kozuka T Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1999 Sep; 59(11):521-5. PubMed ID: 10536448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soft-copy sonography: cost reduction sensitivity analysis in a pediatric hospital. Don S; Albertina MJ; Ammann D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):571-5. PubMed ID: 9490933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of conventional film, CR hard copy and PACS soft copy images of the chest: analyses of ROC curves and inter-observer agreement. Weatherburn GC; Ridout D; Strickland NH; Robins P; Glastonbury CM; Curati W; Harvey C; Shadbolt C Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 12927664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Soft copy using image processing in place of hard copy for detection of subtle pulmonary lesions: is it actually cost-effective? Abe K; Kosuda S; Iwasaki Y; Hama Y; Kaji T; Kusano S; Ozeki Y; Ichihara K Radiat Med; 2004; 22(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 15648452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Interpretation of chest radiographs in the intensive care unit: a hard- versus soft-copy comparative study]. Bricault I; Bosson JL; Declety P; Lavagne P; Ferretti G J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):993-9. PubMed ID: 13679753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subtle pulmonary disease: detection with computed radiography versus conventional chest radiography. Ishigaki T; Endo T; Ikeda M; Kono M; Yoshida S; Ikezoe J; Murata K; Matsumoto M Radiology; 1996 Oct; 201(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8816520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conversion to soft-copy sonography: effects on imaging time and costs. Don S; Hurt JL; Hildeboldt CF Pediatr Radiol; 2000 Aug; 30(8):573-8. PubMed ID: 10993544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of intraaxial and extraaxial brain lesions with digitized computed tomographic images versus film: ROC analysis. el-Saden SM; Hademenos GJ; Zhu W; Sayre JW; Glenn B; Steidler J; Kode L; King B; Quinones D; Valentino DJ; Bentson JR Acad Radiol; 1997 Feb; 4(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 9061080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film. Reiner BI; Siegel EL; Hooper FJ; Pomerantz S; Dahlke A; Rallis D AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Apr; 176(4):861-4. PubMed ID: 11264065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of PACS and hard-copy 51-inch radiographs for measuring leg length and deformity. Khakharia S; Bigman D; Fragomen AT; Pavlov H; Rozbruch SR Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):244-50. PubMed ID: 20625949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long line positioning in neonates: does computed radiography improve visibility? Evans A; Natarajan J; Davies CJ Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2004 Jan; 89(1):F44-5. PubMed ID: 14711855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]