These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9243466)

  • 1. Lateral scatter correction algorithm for percentage depth dose in a large-field photon beam.
    Sánchez-Nieto B; Sánchez-Doblado F; Terrón JA; Arráns R; Errazquin L
    Med Dosim; 1997; 22(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 9243466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Backscatter correction algorithm for TBI treatment conditions.
    Sanchez-Nieto B; Sanchez-Doblado F; Arrans R; Terron JA; Errazquin L
    Med Dosim; 1993; 18(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 8280360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conversion of measured percentage depth dose to tissue maximum ratio values in stereotactic radiotherapy.
    van Battum LJ; Essers M; Storchi PR
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3289-300. PubMed ID: 12375821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A consistent formalism for the application of phantom and collimator scatter factors.
    Venselaar JL; van Gasteren JJ; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van der Laarse R; Kleffens HJ; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):365-81. PubMed ID: 10070788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surface dosimetry for oblique tangential photon beams: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Chow JC; Grigorov GN
    Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 18293563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Commissioning and evaluation of an extended SSD photon model for PINNACLE3: an application to total body irradiation.
    Lavallée MC; Gingras L; Chrétien M; Aubin S; Côté C; Beaulieu L
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3844-55. PubMed ID: 19746817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of phantom size on output, peak scatter factor, and percentage depth dose in large-field photon irradiation.
    Podgorsak EB; Pla C; Evans MD; Pla M
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(5):639-45. PubMed ID: 3900670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling transmission and scatter for photon beam attenuators.
    Ahnesjö A; Weber L; Nilsson P
    Med Phys; 1995 Nov; 22(11 Pt 1):1711-20. PubMed ID: 8587523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wedge factor constituents of high-energy photon beams: head and phantom scatter dose components.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Radiother Oncol; 1994 Jul; 32(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7938681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An analytical formalism to calculate phantom scatter factors for flattening filter free (FFF) mode photon beams.
    Chung H; Prado KL; Yi BY
    Phys Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 59(4):951-60. PubMed ID: 24503449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Physical aspects of total-body irradiation at the Middlesex Hospital (UCL group of hospitals), London 1988-1993: I. Phantom measurements and planning methods.
    Planskoy B; Bedford AM; Davis FM; Tapper PD; Loverock LT
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Nov; 41(11):2307-26. PubMed ID: 8938028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Whole-body dose equivalent including neutrons is similar for 6 MV and 15 MV IMRT, VMAT, and 3D conformal radiotherapy.
    Hauri P; Schneider U
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 20(3):56-70. PubMed ID: 30791198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The separation of the head and phantom scatter components from a phase space description.
    Sanz DE; Nelli FE
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Sep; 49(18):4259-75. PubMed ID: 15509064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of correction factors for a 2D diode array device in MV photon beams.
    Zhou X; Both S; Zhu TC
    Med Phys; 2009 Feb; 36(2):523-9. PubMed ID: 19291991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing two methods for calculating phantom scatter.
    McDonough J; Xiao Y; Bjärngard BE
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):N9-14. PubMed ID: 10070805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limiting values of backscatter factors for low-energy x-ray beams.
    Patrocinio HJ; Bissonnette JP; Bussière MR; Schreiner LJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Feb; 41(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 8746107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Off-axis primary-dose measurements using a mini-phantom.
    Johnsson SA; Ceberg CP
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):763-7. PubMed ID: 9167169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Calculation of the absorbed dose distribution due to irregularly shaped photon beams using pencil beam kernels derived form basic beam data.
    Storchi P; Woudstra E
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Apr; 41(4):637-56. PubMed ID: 8730662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Measurement of peak correction factor of Farmer chamber for calibration of flattening filter free (FFF) clinical photon beams].
    Kontra G; Major T; Polgár C
    Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 26035159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.