These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
65. Effect size calculation in meta-analyses of psychotherapy outcome research. Hoyt WT; Del Re AC Psychother Res; 2018 May; 28(3):379-388. PubMed ID: 29179665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. On the Multilevel Nature of Meta-Analysis: A Tutorial, Comparison of Software Programs, and Discussion of Analytic Choices. Pastor DA; Lazowski RA Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(1):74-89. PubMed ID: 28952787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Measurement-comparable effect sizes for single-case studies of free-operant behavior. Pustejovsky JE Psychol Methods; 2015 Sep; 20(3):342-59. PubMed ID: 24773357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The impact of data-analysis methods on cumulative research knowledge: statistical significance testing, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. Schmidt F; Hunter JE Eval Health Prof; 1995 Dec; 18(4):408-27. PubMed ID: 10153165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Quasi-experimental study designs series-paper 10: synthesizing evidence for effects collected from quasi-experimental studies presents surmountable challenges. Becker BJ; Aloe AM; Duvendack M; Stanley TD; Valentine JC; Fretheim A; Tugwell P J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Sep; 89():84-91. PubMed ID: 28365308 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Meta-analysis: appropriate tool for the integration of nursing research? Lynn MR Nurs Res; 1989; 38(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 2798158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Reconsidering overlap-based measures for quantitative synthesis of single-subject data: what they tell us and what they don't. Carter M Behav Modif; 2013 May; 37(3):378-90. PubMed ID: 23408384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Hypothesis formulation and testing in substance use prevention research. Hansen WB NIDA Res Monogr; 1994; 139():59-74. PubMed ID: 8742551 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Further developments in summarising and meta-analysing single-case data: An illustration with neurobehavioural interventions in acquired brain injury. Manolov R; Rochat L Neuropsychol Rehabil; 2015; 25(5):637-62. PubMed ID: 26214248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Between-case standardized effect size analysis of single case designs: Examination of the two methods. Odom SL; Barton EE; Reichow B; Swaminathan H; Pustejovsky JE Res Dev Disabil; 2018 Aug; 79():88-96. PubMed ID: 29807692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Importance of meta-analysis as a quantitative technic for studying reviews in the health sciences]. Gómez J; Artés M; Segú JL Med Clin (Barc); 1989 Sep; 93(8):295-7. PubMed ID: 2607834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Validity and Reliability of GraphClick and DataThief III for Data Extraction. Flower A; McKenna JW; Upreti G Behav Modif; 2016 May; 40(3):396-413. PubMed ID: 26611466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Prevention evaluation research methods: findings and consensus. Leukefeld CG; Bukoski WJ NIDA Res Monogr; 1991; 107():264-71. PubMed ID: 1922310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. Using response ratios for meta-analyzing single-case designs with behavioral outcomes. Pustejovsky JE J Sch Psychol; 2018 Jun; 68():99-112. PubMed ID: 29861034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]