These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9244026)

  • 1. Reshaping the Macintosh blade using biomechanical modelling. A prospective comparative study in patients.
    Bucx MJ; Snijders CJ; ven der Vegt MH; Holstein JD; Stijnen T
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Jul; 52(7):662-7. PubMed ID: 9244026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors by video laryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Wieringa PA
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Feb; 56(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 22091734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of a modified Macintosh laryngoscope in a manikin.
    Bucx MJ; Snijders CJ; van der Vegt MH; Stijnen T
    Can J Anaesth; 1998 May; 45(5 Pt 1):483-7. PubMed ID: 9598265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lower flange modification improves performance of the Macintosh, but not the Miller laryngoscope blade.
    Kimberger O; Fischer L; Plank C; Mayer N
    Can J Anaesth; 2006 Jun; 53(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 16738295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forces acting on the maxillary incisor teeth during laryngoscopy using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Bucx MJ; Snijders CJ; van Geel RT; Robers C; van de Giessen H; Erdmann W; Stijnen T
    Anaesthesia; 1994 Dec; 49(12):1064-70. PubMed ID: 7864323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Callender modification of the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces the risk of tooth-blade contact in children.
    Mireskandari SM; Askarizadeh N; Darabi ME; Rahimi E; Ataee HA; Chamrami F; Eghtesadi-Araghi P
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Nov; 18(11):1035-9. PubMed ID: 18950325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forces applied to the maxillary incisors during video-assisted intubation.
    Lee RA; van Zundert AA; Maassen RL; Willems RJ; Beeke LP; Schaaper JN; van Dobbelsteen J; Wieringa PA
    Anesth Analg; 2009 Jan; 108(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 19095848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Callander laryngoscope blade modification is associated with a decreased risk of dental contact.
    Lee J; Choi JH; Lee YK; Kim ES; Kwon OK; Hastings RH
    Can J Anaesth; 2004 Feb; 51(2):181-4. PubMed ID: 14766698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.
    McCoy EP; Mirakhur RK; Rafferty C; Bunting H; Austin BA
    Anaesthesia; 1996 Oct; 51(10):912-5. PubMed ID: 8984862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does experience influence the forces exerted on maxillary incisors during laryngoscopy? A manikin study using the Macintosh laryngoscope.
    Bucx MJ; van Geel RT; Wegener JT; Robers C; Stijnen T
    Can J Anaesth; 1995 Feb; 42(2):144-9. PubMed ID: 7720158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of the Laryngopharyngeal Examination blade and the English Macintosh laryngoscope blade using an intubating manikin: a prospective randomized crossover study.
    Ashfaque M; Mason J; Al-Shaikh B; Adegoke K
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2009 Nov; 26(11):917-22. PubMed ID: 19593148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomised comparison of three laryngoscopes with the Macintosh.
    Maleck WH; Koetter KP; Lenz M; Piper SN; Triem J; Boldt J
    Resuscitation; 1999 Nov; 42(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 10625166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the distance between the laryngoscope blade and the upper incisors during direct laryngoscopy: comparisons of a curved, an angulated straight, and two straight blades.
    Watanabe S; Suga A; Asakura N; Takeshima R; Kimura T; Taguchi N; Kumagai M
    Anesth Analg; 1994 Oct; 79(4):638-41. PubMed ID: 7943768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.
    Asai T; Matsumoto S; Fujise K; Johmura S; Shingu K
    Br J Anaesth; 2003 Apr; 90(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 12644417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The pressure exerted on the tongue during intubation with simultaneous cervical spine immobilisation: a comparison between four videolaryngoscopes and the Macintosh laryngoscope-a manikin study.
    Aleksandrowicz D; Gaszyński T
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2018 Oct; 32(5):907-913. PubMed ID: 29260450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial comparing performance of Macintosh and Airtraq laryngoscopes.
    Ndoko SK; Amathieu R; Tual L; Polliand C; Kamoun W; El Housseini L; Champault G; Dhonneur G
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Feb; 100(2):263-8. PubMed ID: 18211999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A randomized comparison between the Pentax AWS video laryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope in morbidly obese patients.
    Abdallah R; Galway U; You J; Kurz A; Sessler DI; Doyle DJ
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Nov; 113(5):1082-7. PubMed ID: 21918156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomised, crossover study of the Dorges, McCoy and Macintosh laryngoscope blades in a simulated difficult intubation scenario.
    Sethuraman D; Darshane S; Guha A; Charters P
    Anaesthesia; 2006 May; 61(5):482-7. PubMed ID: 16674625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison between the Macintosh and the McCoy laryngoscope blades.
    Cook TM; Tuckey JP
    Anaesthesia; 1996 Oct; 51(10):977-80. PubMed ID: 8984878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation.
    Henderson JJ
    Anaesthesia; 1997 Jun; 52(6):552-60. PubMed ID: 9203882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.