164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 924449)
1. The ethical responsibilities at issue.
Adams EM
In Vitro; 1977 Oct; 13(10):595-611. PubMed ID: 924449
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Values, obligations, and virtues: approaches to bio-medical ethics.
Ogletree TW
J Relig Ethics; 1976; 4(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 11663657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Christianity views fetal research.
Quinn JJ
Linacre Q; 1978 Feb; 45(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 11660912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fetal research, morality, & public policy.
McCormick RA
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):26-31. PubMed ID: 1150415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An overview of the scientist's responsibilities: comments by an ethicist.
Rachels J
In Vitro; 1977 Oct; 13(10):728-47. PubMed ID: 924457
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: from the perspective of responsibility.
Gardner EC
Perkins J; 1977; 30(3):10-28. PubMed ID: 11658311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and the golden rule.
Hare RM
Philos Public Aff; 1975; 4(3):201-22. PubMed ID: 11661183
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. To what do we have moral obligations and why? II.
Gillon R
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1985 Jun; 290(6483):1734-6. PubMed ID: 3924233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bioethics and the process of embodiment.
Engelhardt HT
Perspect Biol Med; 1975; 18(4):486-500. PubMed ID: 1165979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The unborn. Human values and responsibilities.
Tiefel HO
JAMA; 1978 May; 239(21):2263-7. PubMed ID: 650806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
Hicks SC
Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal research II: the ethical questions.
Brown HO
Hum Life Rev; 1975; 1(4):118-28. PubMed ID: 11663565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On the bounds of freedom: from the treatment of fetuses to euthanasia.
Engelhardt HT
Conn Med; 1976 Jan; 40(1):51-4, 57. PubMed ID: 1245101
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The relevance of a biological definition of life to fundamental rights.
Main EJ
Med Law; 1987; 6(3):189-209. PubMed ID: 3586886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Human embryos and the argument from potential.
Gillon R
J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 1870083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal tissue research: Jewish tradition and public policy.
Bleich JD
Tradition; 1989; 24(4):69-90. PubMed ID: 11650894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pregnancy, obstetrics and the moral status of the fetus.
Gillon R
J Med Ethics; 1988 Mar; 14(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 3351880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Ethics and embryos.
Poplawski N; Gillett G
J Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; 17(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 1870084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal experimentation: moral, legal, and medical implications.
Reback GL
Stanford Law Rev; 1974 May; 26(5):1191-207. PubMed ID: 11663472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The status of the fetus.
Wasserstrom R
Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Jun; 5(3):18-22. PubMed ID: 1150411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
