92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9244654)
1. [40 years breast carcinoma treatment in the Neubrandenburg region.Can an increase in prognostically more favorable stages be detected?].
Rühle H; Grobe N; Balschat S; Ernst KF; Dewitz D; Winkler L
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1997 Mar; 91(2):135-7. PubMed ID: 9244654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Breast cancer screening. State of the art and introduction to preventive measures].
von Fournier D; Anton HW; Junkermann H; Bastert G; van Kaick G
Radiologe; 1993 May; 33(5):227-35. PubMed ID: 8516433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between method of detection of breast cancer and stage of disease, method of treatment, and survival in women aged 40 to 49 years.
Maibenco D; Daoud Y; Phillips E; Saxe A
Am Surg; 1999 Nov; 65(11):1061-6. PubMed ID: 10551757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Changes in TNM stages in breast carcinoma over the course of 20 years].
Höfig G; Dettbarn M; Fritzsche A; Hohaus B
Zentralbl Chir; 1998; 123 Suppl 5():23-4. PubMed ID: 10063566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in management techniques and patterns of disease recurrence over time in patients with breast carcinoma treated with breast-conserving therapy at a single institution.
Pass H; Vicini FA; Kestin LL; Goldstein NS; Decker D; Pettinga J; Ingold J; Benitez P; Neumann K; Rebner M; Dekhne N; Martinez A
Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 15305400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the contralateral breast in patients with ipsilateral breast carcinoma: the role of mammography.
Muttarak M; Pojchamarnwiputh S; Padungchaichote W; Chaiwun B
Singapore Med J; 2002 May; 43(5):229-33. PubMed ID: 12188073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The natural history of breast carcinoma in the elderly: implications for screening and treatment.
Singh R; Hellman S; Heimann R
Cancer; 2004 May; 100(9):1807-13. PubMed ID: 15112260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for breast cancer.
Duffy SW; Smith RA; Gabe R; Tabár L; Yen AM; Chen TH
Surg Oncol Clin N Am; 2005 Oct; 14(4):671-97. PubMed ID: 16226686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does stage at diagnosis explain the difference in survival after breast cancer in Denmark and Sweden?
Jensen AR; Garne JP; Storm HH; Engholm G; Möller T; Overgaard J
Acta Oncol; 2004; 43(8):719-26. PubMed ID: 15764216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Screening lowers breast cancer mortality. Motivate your patients for mammography].
Kessler M; Schneider P; Sittek H; Reiser M
MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jul; 143(28-29):32-5. PubMed ID: 11499144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The value of the localization technique of occult breast changes with reference to future screening programs].
Hess T; Benz J; Juchler A
Helv Chir Acta; 1992 May; 59(1):263-8. PubMed ID: 1526839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties.
Duffy SW; Tabár L; Chen HH; Holmqvist M; Yen MF; Abdsalah S; Epstein B; Frodis E; Ljungberg E; Hedborg-Melander C; Sundbom A; Tholin M; Wiege M; Akerlund A; Wu HM; Tung TS; Chiu YH; Chiu CP; Huang CC; Smith RA; Rosén M; Stenbeck M; Holmberg L
Cancer; 2002 Aug; 95(3):458-69. PubMed ID: 12209737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Service screening mammography reduces breast cancer mortality among elderly women in Turku.
Parvinen I; Helenius H; Pylkkänen L; Anttila A; Immonen-Räihä P; Kauhava L; Räsänen O; Klemi PJ
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 16569304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognosis in women with a carcinoma in situ of the breast: a population-based study in Sweden.
Wärnberg F; Bergh J; Holmberg L
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Sep; 8(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 10498395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast cancer incidence and mortality in the Nordic capitals, 1970-1998. Trends related to mammography screening programmes.
Törnberg S; Kemetli L; Lynge E; Helene Olsen A; Hofvind S; Wang H; Anttila A; Hakama M; Nyström L
Acta Oncol; 2006; 45(5):528-35. PubMed ID: 16864165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends in breast cancer during three decades in Denmark: stage at diagnosis, surgical management and survival.
Jensen AR; Madsen AH; Overgaard J
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 18465319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast carcinoma screening and risk perception among women at increased risk for breast carcinoma: results from a national survey.
Sabatino SA; Burns RB; Davis RB; Phillips RS; Chen YH; McCarthy EP
Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(11):2338-46. PubMed ID: 15160336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.
Lee CH; Weinreb JC
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Mar; 1(3):176-82. PubMed ID: 17411555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
