180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9245885)
1. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A).
Barthe N; Braillon P; Ducassou D; Basse-Cathalinat B
Br J Radiol; 1997 Jul; 70(835):728-39. PubMed ID: 9245885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: clinical evaluation of a new cone-beam system.
Blake GM; Knapp KM; Fogelman I
Calcif Tissue Int; 2005 Feb; 76(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 15645160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.
Staal KP; Roos JC; Manoliu RA; Kostense PJ; Lips P;
Osteoporos Int; 2004 Apr; 15(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 14628109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-Calibrated Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanners Demonstrate Systematic Bias in Pediatric and Young Adult Females.
Dowthwaite JN; Dunsmore KA; Wang D; Rosenbaum PF; Scerpella TA
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):281-294. PubMed ID: 28258886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Follow-up of individual patients on two DXA scanners of the same manufacturer.
Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 2000; 11(8):709-13. PubMed ID: 11095175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of phantoms for cross-calibration of lumbar spine DXA.
Pearson D; Cawte SA; Green DJ
Osteoporos Int; 2002 Dec; 13(12):948-54. PubMed ID: 12459937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of BMD precision for Prodigy and Delphi spine and femur scans.
Shepherd JA; Fan B; Lu Y; Lewiecki EM; Miller P; Genant HK
Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(9):1303-8. PubMed ID: 16823544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-calibration of DXA equipment: upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000.
Faulkner KG; Glüer CC; Estilo M; Genant HK
Calcif Tissue Int; 1993 Feb; 52(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 8443695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.
Blake GM; Parker JC; Buxton FM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1993 Oct; 66(790):902-6. PubMed ID: 8220974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intersite comparison of the Hologic QDR-1000 dual energy X-ray bone densitometer.
Blake GM; Tong CM; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1991 May; 64(761):440-6. PubMed ID: 2036569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons between Hologic QDR 1000W, QDR 4500A, and Lunar Expert dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scanners used for measuring total body bone and soft tissue.
Tothill P; Hannan WJ
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000 May; 904():63-71. PubMed ID: 10865711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison and cross-calibration of DXA systems: ODX-240 and Sophos L-XRA versus Hologic QDR-4500, for spinal bone mineral measurement. Translation of a reference database.
Benmalek A; Sabatier JP
Osteoporos Int; 1998; 8(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10326063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual X-ray absorptiometry: cross-calibration of a new fan-beam system.
Blake GM; Harrison EJ; Adams JE
Calcif Tissue Int; 2004 Jul; 75(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 15037973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of four methods for cross-calibrating dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers to eliminate systematic errors when upgrading equipment.
Finkelstein JS; Butler JP; Cleary RL; Neer RM
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Dec; 9(12):1945-52. PubMed ID: 7872060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Switching from DXA pencil-beam to fan-beam. II: Studies in vivo.
Eiken P; Kolthoff N; Bärenholdt O; Hermansen F; Pors Nielsen S
Bone; 1994; 15(6):671-6. PubMed ID: 7873296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons between three dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers used for measuring spine and femur.
Tothill P; Fenner JA; Reid DM
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jun; 68(810):621-9. PubMed ID: 7627485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation and application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure bone mineral density in rabbit vertebrae.
Norris SA; Pettifor JM; Gray DA; Biscardi A; Buffenstein R
J Clin Densitom; 2000; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 10917741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-calibration, precision and patient dose measurements in preparation for clinical trials using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine.
Cawte SA; Pearson D; Green DJ; Maslanka WB; Miller CG; Rogers AT
Br J Radiol; 1999 Apr; 72(856):354-62. PubMed ID: 10474496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
