These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9246169)
1. Penetration depth of Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser in human skin. Trelles MA; David LM; Rigau J Dermatol Surg; 1996 Oct; 22(10):863-5. PubMed ID: 9246169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological and clinical evaluation of facial resurfacing using a carbon dioxide laser with the computer pattern generator. Rubach BW; Schoenrock LD Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 123(9):929-34. PubMed ID: 9305242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Animal study of skin resurfacing using the ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser. Yang CC; Chai CY Ann Plast Surg; 1995 Aug; 35(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 7486737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of varying density patterns and passes on depth of penetration in facial skin utilizing the carbon dioxide laser with automated scanner. Grover S; Apfelberg DB; Smoller B Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Dec; 104(7):2247-52; discussion 2253-4. PubMed ID: 11149794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative clinical trial of 2 carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers with varying pulse durations. 100 microseconds vs 1 millisecond. Duke D; Khatri K; Grevelink JM; Anderson RR Arch Dermatol; 1998 Oct; 134(10):1240-6. PubMed ID: 9801679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A clinical and histological comparison of flashscanning versus pulsed technology in carbon dioxide laser facial skin resurfacing. Trelles MA; Rigau J; Mellor TK; García L Dermatol Surg; 1998 Jan; 24(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9464287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of four carbon dioxide resurfacing lasers. A clinical and histopathologic evaluation. Alster TS; Nanni CA; Williams CM Dermatol Surg; 1999 Mar; 25(3):153-8; discussion 159. PubMed ID: 10193958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin resurfacing of facial rhytides and scars with the 90-microsecond short pulse CO2 laser. Comparison to the 900-microsecond dwell time CO2 lasers and clinical experience. Moy RL; Bucalo B; Lee MH; Wieder J; Chalet MD; Ostad A; Dishell WD Dermatol Surg; 1998 Dec; 24(12):1390-6. PubMed ID: 9865210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative comparison of inflammatory infiltrate and linear contraction in human skin treated with 90-microsecond pulsed and 900-microsecond dwell time carbon dioxide lasers. Bucalo BD; Moy RL Dermatol Surg; 1998 Dec; 24(12):1314-6. PubMed ID: 9865195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are more passes better? Safety versus efficacy with the pulsed CO2 laser. Burkhardt BR; Maw R Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1531-4. PubMed ID: 9385968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Caomparison of two high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide lasers in the treatment of periorbital rhytides. Alster TS Dermatol Surg; 1996 Jun; 22(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 8646469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. UltraPulse carbon dioxide laser with CPG scanner for deepithelialization: clinical and histologic study. Apfelberg DB; Smoller B Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):2089-94. PubMed ID: 9180739 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depth of vaporization and the effect of pulse stacking with a high-energy, pulsed carbon dioxide laser. Fitzpatrick RE; Smith SR; Sriprachya-anunt S J Am Acad Dermatol; 1999 Apr; 40(4):615-22. PubMed ID: 10188684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser skin resurfacing of the face with a combined CO2/Er:YAG laser. Goldman MP; Marchell N; Fitzpatrick RE Dermatol Surg; 2000 Feb; 26(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 10691935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Skin resurfacing with the Ultrapulse carbon dioxide laser. Observations on 100 patients. Lowe NJ; Lask G; Griffin ME; Maxwell A; Lowe P; Quilada F Dermatol Surg; 1995 Dec; 21(12):1025-9. PubMed ID: 7496669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation of histological findings of single session Er:YAG skin fractional resurfacing with various passes and energies and the possible clinical implications. Trelles MA; Vélez M; Mordon S Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Mar; 40(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 18366083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic effects of the high-energy pulsed CO2 laser on photoaged facial skin. Stuzin JM; Baker TJ; Baker TM; Kligman AM Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Jun; 99(7):2036-50; discussion 2051-5. PubMed ID: 9180729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microscopically controlled surgical excision combined with ultrapulse CO2 vaporization in the management of a patient with the nevoid basal cell carcinoma syndrome. Krunic AL; Viehman GE; Madani S; Clark RE J Dermatol; 1998 Jan; 25(1):10-2. PubMed ID: 9519602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Residual thermal damage resulting from pulsed and scanned resurfacing lasers. Bernstein EF; Brown DB; Kenkel J; Burns AJ Dermatol Surg; 1999 Oct; 25(10):739-44. PubMed ID: 10594573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results after CO2 laser skin resurfacing: a comparison of scanned and pulsed systems. Ross EV; Grossman MC; Duke D; Grevelink JM J Am Acad Dermatol; 1997 Nov; 37(5 Pt 1):709-18. PubMed ID: 9366815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]