These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9246970)

  • 1. An economic evaluation of laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of tubal pregnancy.
    Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hemrika DJ; Bossuyt PM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 Jul; 76(6):596-600. PubMed ID: 9246970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Is conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy preferable to salpingectomy? An economic analysis.
    Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Jul; 104(7):834-9. PubMed ID: 9236650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treatment of tubal pregnancy in the netherlands: an economic comparison of systemic methotrexate administration and laparoscopic salpingostomy.
    Mol BW; Hajenius PJ; Engelsbel S; Ankum WM; Hemrika DJ; Van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Oct; 181(4):945-51. PubMed ID: 10521759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of salpingotomy and salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (a randomized controlled trial).
    Mol F; van Mello NM; Strandell A; Jurkovic D; Ross JA; Yalcinkaya TM; Barnhart KT; Verhoeve HR; Graziosi GC; Koks CA; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Hajenius PJ; van Wely M;
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2038-47. PubMed ID: 26173606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cost-effectiveness study of a randomised trial of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy.
    Gray DT; Thorburn J; Lundorff P; Strandell A; Lindblom B
    Lancet; 1995 May; 345(8958):1139-43. PubMed ID: 7723545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Hajenius PJ; Mol BW; Bossuyt PM; Ankum WM; Van Der Veen F
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000; (2):CD000324. PubMed ID: 10796710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy management of tubal pregnancy.
    Saleh AM; Mahjoub MM; El-Kurdy AM
    Saudi Med J; 2001 Sep; 22(9):771-5. PubMed ID: 11590450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tubal ectopic pregnancy: an evaluation of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy in 614 patients.
    Lo L; Pun TC; Chan S
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 May; 39(2):185-7. PubMed ID: 10755775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re-evaluation of the indication for and limitation of laparoscopic salpingotomy for tubal pregnancy.
    Fujishita A; Khan KN; Kitajima M; Hiraki K; Miura S; Ishimaru T; Masuzaki H
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Apr; 137(2):210-6. PubMed ID: 17459564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clearance curves of serum human chorionic gonadotrophin for the diagnosis of persistent trophoblast.
    Hajenius PJ; Mol BW; Ankum WM; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Lammes FB
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Mar; 10(3):683-7. PubMed ID: 7782454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Treatment of tubal pregnancy by laparoscopic laser surgery.
    Langebrekke A; Kirschner R; Skår OJ; Sørnes T; Urnes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1991; 70(4-5):331-4. PubMed ID: 1836086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of reoperation for infertility women with tubal pregnancy after conservative surgery].
    Hu C; Chen Y; Hou H; Chen X; Kong X; Yin L; Zhu L
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Mar; 94(11):848-51. PubMed ID: 24854754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Persistent ectopic pregnancy following conservative surgery for tubal pregnancy.
    Dwarakanath LS; Mascarenhas L; Penketh RJ; Newton JR
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Oct; 103(10):1021-4. PubMed ID: 8863702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic surgery in ectopic pregnancy.
    Lundorff P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1997; 164():81-4. PubMed ID: 9225646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Treatment of tubal pregnancy laparoscopically].
    Horak S; Rzempołuch J; Blecharz A
    Ginekol Pol; 1992 Feb; 63(2):97-9. PubMed ID: 1305594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fertility after conservative and radical surgery for tubal pregnancy.
    Mol BW; Matthijsse HC; Tinga DJ; Huynh T; Hajenius PJ; Ankum WM; Bossuyt PM; van der Veen F
    Hum Reprod; 1998 Jul; 13(7):1804-9. PubMed ID: 9740428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is serum human chorionic gonadotrophin follow-up necessary after suspected spillage of trophoblast at the time of laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy?
    Bora SA; Kirk E; Daemen A; Timmerman D; Bourne T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 71(4):225-8. PubMed ID: 21160149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Conservative surgery in tubal pregnancy].
    Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Jul; 24(4):206-8, 251. PubMed ID: 2533547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic management of tubal ectopic pregnancy.
    Ding DC; Chu TY; Kao SP; Chen PC; Wei YC
    JSLS; 2008; 12(3):273-6. PubMed ID: 18765051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conservative versus radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. A review.
    Clausen I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Jan; 75(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 8561006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.