These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9246984)
1. Poor reproducibility of classification of proximal humeral fractures. Additional CT of minor value. Sjödén GO; Movin T; Güntner P; Aspelin P; Ahrengart L; Ersmark H; Sperber A Acta Orthop Scand; 1997 Jun; 68(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 9246984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures. Sjödén GO; Movin T; Aspelin P; Güntner P; Shalabi A Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Aug; 70(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 10569259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems. Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The reliability and reproducibility of the Hertel classification for comminuted proximal humeral fractures compared with the Neer classification. Iordens GI; Mahabier KC; Buisman FE; Schep NW; Muradin GS; Beenen LF; Patka P; Van Lieshout EM; Den Hartog D J Orthop Sci; 2016 Sep; 21(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 27324664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures. Mahabier KC; Van Lieshout EM; Van Der Schaaf BC; Roukema GR; Punt BJ; Verhofstad MH; Den Hartog D J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures. Papakonstantinou MK; Hart MJ; Farrugia R; Gabbe BJ; Kamali Moaveni A; van Bavel D; Page RS; Richardson MD ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The impact of stereo-visualisation of three-dimensional CT datasets on the inter- and intraobserver reliability of the AO/OTA and Neer classifications in the assessment of fractures of the proximal humerus. Brunner A; Honigmann P; Treumann T; Babst R J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jun; 91(6):766-71. PubMed ID: 19483230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Proximal Humerus Fractures: Reliability of Neer Versus AO Classification on Plain Radiographs and Computed Tomography. Stoddart M; Pearce O; Smith J; McCann P; Sheridan B; Al-Hourani K Cureus; 2020 Jun; 12(6):e8520. PubMed ID: 32656034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low agreement among 24 doctors using the Neer-classification; only moderate agreement on displacement, even between specialists. Brorson S; Bagger J; Sylvest A; Hróbjartsson A Int Orthop; 2002; 26(5):271-3. PubMed ID: 12378351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations. Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interobserver reliability of classification and characterization of proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of two and three-dimensional CT. Bruinsma WE; Guitton TG; Warner JJ; Ring D; J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Sep; 95(17):1600-4. PubMed ID: 24005201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures. Spek RWA; Schoolmeesters BJA; Oosterhoff JHF; Doornberg JN; van den Bekerom MPJ; Jaarsma RL; Eygendaal D; IJpma F; Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy. Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of recategorized Neer classification in differentiating 2-part surgical neck fractures from multi-fragmented proximal humeral fractures in 116 patients. Sumrein BO; Mattila VM; Lepola V; Laitinen MK; Launonen AP; J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Oct; 27(10):1756-1761. PubMed ID: 29866397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of the modified Neer classification defining displacement with respect to the humeral head fragment for proximal humeral fractures. Matsumura N; Furuhata R; Seto T; Takada Y; Shirasawa H; Oki S; Kawano Y; Shiono S J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Sep; 15(1):438. PubMed ID: 32967709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]