66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9248958)
1. Standardization of susceptibility testing methods.
Phillips I; King A
J Chemother; 1997 May; 9 Suppl 1():13-8. PubMed ID: 9248958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of the results of in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing using the Fungitest kit and the disc diffusion test].
Buchta V; Navrátilová L; Förstl M; Kubanová P
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek; 2004 Apr; 10(2):80-7. PubMed ID: 15146386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility of Helicobacter pylori to metronidazole.
Perna F; Gatta L; Figura N; Ricci C; Tampieri A; Holton J; Miglioli M; Vaira D
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Oct; 98(10):2157-61. PubMed ID: 14572561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Standardization of the methods for determining microorganism sensitivity to antibiotics. Semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation of the results of the diffusion test].
Givental' NI; Ved'mina EA; Bogdanova LF; Vlasova IV
Antibiotiki; 1980 Jun; 25(6):420-4. PubMed ID: 7396439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of current methods for detection of staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides.
Walsh TR; Bolmström A; Qwärnström A; Ho P; Wootton M; Howe RA; MacGowan AP; Diekema D
J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Jul; 39(7):2439-44. PubMed ID: 11427551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antifungal susceptibility testing method for resource constrained laboratories.
Khan S; Singhal S; Mathur T; Upadhyay DJ; Rattan A
Indian J Med Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 24(3):171-6. PubMed ID: 16912435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole assayed by a disk diffusion method with automated reading versus a microdilution method.
Finquelievich JL; Iovannitti CA; Mujica MT; Relloso S; Carnovale S; de Elías Costa MR; Jewtuchowicz V; Espinel-Ingroff A
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2003; 35(4):214-8. PubMed ID: 14976874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Rapid ATB. A new system of antibiotic testing in 4 hours. Description and parameters of variation].
Gayral JP; Carret G; Flandrois JP; Le Noc P; Robert J; Albertini MT; Gallice E
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May; 33(5):350-3. PubMed ID: 3897964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro susceptibility testing of dermatophytes: comparison of disk diffusion and reference broth dilution methods.
Karaca N; Koç AN
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2004 Apr; 48(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 15062918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Antifungal susceptibility testing: progress and future developments.
Pfaller MA
Braz J Infect Dis; 2000 Apr; 4(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 11012296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Principles of assessing bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics using the agar diffusion method.
Bonev B; Hooper J; Parisot J
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2008 Jun; 61(6):1295-301. PubMed ID: 18339637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Disk diffusion testing using Candida sp. colonies taken directly from CHROMagar Candida medium may decrease time required to obtain results.
Klevay M; Ebinger A; Diekema D; Messer S; Hollis R; Pfaller M
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Jul; 43(7):3497-9. PubMed ID: 16000489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for erythromycin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline susceptibility testing of Campylobacter coli and for tetracycline susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni.
Gaudreau C; Girouard Y; Gilbert H; Gagnon J; Bekal S
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2008 Dec; 52(12):4475-7. PubMed ID: 18838597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical methods for establishing quality control ranges for antibacterial agents in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute susceptibility testing.
Turnidge J; Bordash G
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Jul; 51(7):2483-8. PubMed ID: 17438045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Sensitivity to colistin: evaluation of cut-off points available in disk diffusion test].
Rodríguez CH; Pautaso J; Bombicino K; Vay C; Famiglietti A
Rev Argent Microbiol; 2004; 36(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 15559194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evolution of anaerobe susceptibility testing in the United States.
Hecht DW
Clin Infect Dis; 2002 Sep; 35(Suppl 1):S28-35. PubMed ID: 12173105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of MGIT 960 for rapid quantitative measurement of the susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to ciprofloxacin and ethionamide.
Huang TS; Lee SS; Tu HZ; Huang WK; Chen YS; Huang CK; Wann SR; Lin HH; Liu YC
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2004 Apr; 53(4):600-3. PubMed ID: 14973155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of in vitro methods to analyse the antifungal activity of propolis against yeasts isolated from patients with superficial mycoses.
Silici S; Koc AN
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 43(3):318-24. PubMed ID: 16910939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Standardization of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Barry AL
Clin Lab Med; 1989 Jun; 9(2):203-19. PubMed ID: 2659241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of disk diffusion and agar dilution methods for erythromycin and ciprofloxacin susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni.
Gaudreau C; Girouard Y; Ringuette L; Tsimiklis C
Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2007 Apr; 51(4):1524-6. PubMed ID: 17261628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
